Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_v._City_of_New_York

Clinton v. City of New York, 524 U.S. 417 (1998), is a legal case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the line-item veto as granted in the Line Item Veto Act of 1996 violated the Presentment Clause of the United States Constitution because it impermissibly gave the President of the United States the  ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton

William Jefferson Clinton is an American politician who served as the 42nd President of the United States from 1993 to 2001. Prior to the presidency, he was the Governor of Arkansas from 1979 to 1981, and again from 1983 to 1992. A member of the Democratic Party, Clinton was ideologically a New Democrat and many of ...

www.oyez.org/cases/1997/97-1374

Apr 27, 1998 ... Clinton v. City of New York ... Citation. 524 US 417 (1998) ... This case consolidates two separate challenges to the constitutionality of two cancellations, made by President William J. Clinton, under the Line Item Veto Act ("Act"). In the first, the City of New York, two hospital associations, a hospital, and two ...

www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/constitutional-law/constitutional-law-keyed-to-cohen/separation-of-powers/clinton-v-new-york

The Appellees brought an action in the Supreme Court of United States ( Supreme Court) against the President of the United States William Clinton ( President Clinton). The Appellees argued that President Clinton's use of the Line Item Veto Act of 1996 (the Act) to void a part of Title XIX of the Social Security Act and a part of ...

www.nytimes.com/2017/04/03/us/politics/trump-bill-clinton-law-suit-paula-jones.html

Apr 3, 2017 ... “This crucial threshold issue was raised, but not decided, by the U.S. Supreme Court in Clinton v. Jones,” the brief said, accurately. The case against Mr. Clinton was brought in federal court. The one against Mr. Trump is in state court. The difference is not trivial, and the Supreme Court based its decision in ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/524/417/case.html

CLINTON, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL. v. CITY OF NEW YORK ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 97-1374. Argued April 27, 1998-Decided June 25,1998. Last Term, this Court determined on expedited review that Members of ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/524/417

Syllabus. CLINTON, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL. v. CITY OF NEW YORK ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 97-1374. Argued April 27, 1998- Decided June 25,1998. Last Term, this Court determined on expedited review that Members ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/524/417

Clinton v. City of New York (97-1374). Argued: April 27, 1998. Decided: June 25, 1998. ___. Syllabus; Opinion, Stevens; Concurrence, Kennedy; CDInPart, Scalia; Dissent, Breyer. Syllabus. Last Term, this Court determined on expedited review that Members of Congress did not have standing to maintain a constitutional ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/95-1853.ZO.html

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D.C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made ...