Welcome to the settlement site. This site may include Frequently Asked Questions, Claim Form, Notice, Settlement Agreement, Complaint, Important Dates and Other Documents in regards to the settlement.
Nov 17, 2016 ... Welcome to the Settlement Agreement page of this settlement site. The Settlement Agreement is designed to inform class members of the judgment decided by the court.
16-___. IN THE. Supreme Court of the United States. CONAGRA BRANDS, INC.,. Petitioner, v. ROBERT BRISEÑO, ET AL.,. Respondents. On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari. To The United States Court Of Appeals. For The Ninth Circuit. PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI. ANGELA M. SPIVEY. MCGUIREWOODS LLP.
Apr 18, 2017 ... A recent decision from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio held that Coach and its Illinois-based counsel could not be sued for collateral harm caused in a trademark dispute that played out in a federal case in Illinois. See Order, Brenda Buschle v. Coach, Inc. et al., Civil Action No ...
Coach, also, has relations with the largest retailers in American and Chinese market, offering a wide range of products to consumers, while the growth of malls in large cities in the world with high real estate costs (Halepete et al., 2008). Additionally, according to Porter (1980) switching costs are the cost of buyer in changing ...
Award by the Honorable Edward O'Connor, Jr., J.S.C. of judgment and attorneys' fees and costs in the matter of Harry Jacquin v. VectorMAX, Inc., Thomas Pragias, et al., Docket No.: L-5805-08, Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division: Hudson County, certifying Ty Hyderally's and Francine Foner's hourly rates and ...
Jun 18, 2012 ... Joseph AGNEW, et al., Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. ... According to plaintiffs, NCAA member schools compete intensely over the premier student-athletes in the country, and if the Bylaws had not been passed, schools ..... See Kristin DeRamus et al., College Football Coach Salary Database, 2006–2011, (Nov.
Jun 8, 2012 ... No Dilution: Failure to prove COACH mark famous; COACH mark “famous” for likelihood of confusion purposes; Insufficient evidence to prove “household ... Research in Motion Ltd. v. Defining Presence Marketing Group, Inc. et al., 102 USPQ.2d 1187, 2012 WL 893481 (TTAB, Feb. 27, 2012). 9. RIM v.
Dec 20, 2016 ... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,. Plaintiffs, v. ANTHEM, INC. and CIGNA CORP.,. Defendants. Case No. 1:16-cv-01493 (ABJ). (Redacted, Public Version). PLAINTIFFS' PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT: PHASE I ...