Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geer_v._Connecticut

Geer v. Connecticut, 161 U.S. 519 (1896), was a United States Supreme Court decision, which dealt with the transportation of wild fowl over state lines. Geer held that the states owned the wild animals within their borders and could strictly regulate their management and harvest. According to the Geer Court, “the right to  ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/tx-court-of-appeals/1273399.html

Oct 9, 2003 ... Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15, 20, 91 S.Ct. 1780, 29 L.Ed.2d 284 (1971). Texas courts have uniformly held that section 42.01 applies to fighting words. Jimmerson v. State, 561 S.W.2d 5, 7 (Tex.Crim.App.1978) (holding that section 42.01(a)(4), by implication, applies only to fighting words); Duran v.

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/273/1/case.html

Albrecht v. United States. No. 9. Argued November 23, 1926. Decided January 3, 1927. 273 U.S. 1. ERROR TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ... Miller and D. P. Coggins," and that these affidavits, which were annexed to the information, had been sworn to before a notary public a state official not authorized to ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/365/551/case.html

State, 62 Wis. 49, 21 N.W. 232; Regina v. Hilton, Bell C.C. 20, 169 Eng.Rep. 1150 , with Allen v. State, 76 Tex.Cr.R. 416, 175 S.W. 700; Regina v. Perkins, 2 Den. C.C. 458, 169 Eng.Rep. 582; Regina v. Coggins, 12 Cox C.C. 517. With respect to the receiving statute before us in Heflin, we decided that "Congress was trying to ...

www.quimbee.com/cases/north-dakota-v-united-states

A summary and case brief of North Dakota v. United States, including the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, key terms, and concurrences and dissents. ... North Dakota v. United States. United States Supreme Court 460 U.S. 300 (1983) ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/407/297

407 U.S. 297. United States v. United States District Court (No. 70-153). Argued: February 24, 1972. Decided: June 19, 1972. ___. Syllabus; Opinion, Powell; Concurrence, Douglas; Concurrence, White. Syllabus. The United States charged three defendants with conspiring to destroy, and one of them with destroying, ...

media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/201514084.pdf

Jan 4, 2018 ... Coggin v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 71 F.3d 855, 860 (11th Cir. 1996) ( quoting United. States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 395 (1948)). As to Foster's sentence, we “must review the sentence under an abuse-of- discretion standard.” Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007).

www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp-content/uploads/sites/14/2015/07/BrownvWilson.pdf

Jul 9, 2015 ... Black, 538 U.S. 343, 359 (2003) (quoting Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15, 20 ( 1971)). Texas courts construing the disorderly conduct statute have held that “[a] ctual or threatened violence is an essential element of a breach of the peace.” Coggin, 123 S.W.3d at 90 (quoting Woods v. State, 213 S.W.2d 385, ...

www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/17/17-818/22841/20171206164646907_Huertas%20petition%20for%20cert%20final%20for%20efiling.pdf

Dec 7, 2017 ... No. 17-______. In the Supreme Court of the United States. BRANDEN HUERTAS ,. Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES,. Respondent. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the. United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI. EUGENE R. FIDELL. Yale Law School.