Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Cook

United States v. Cook, 86 U.S. (19 Wall.) 591 (1873), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Indian tribes do not own the land their reservations are on, the land is owned by the United States and the Indians only have a right to occupy the land. They may not cut and sell timber merely for the ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/288/102

Cook v. United States. No. 82. Argued December 7, 1932. Decided January 23, 1933. 288 U.S. 102. Syllabus. 1. The Treaty of May 22, 1924, with Great Britain, as both its language and its history show, was intended to deal completely with the search and seizure beyond our territorial limits of British vessels suspected of  ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/288/102/case.html

Cook v. United States. No. 82. Argued December 7, 1932. Decided January 23, 1933. 288 U.S. 102. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS. FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. Syllabus. 1. The Treaty of May 22, 1924, with Great Britain, as both its language and its history show, was intended to deal completely with ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/138/157

138 U.S. 157 (11 S.Ct. 268, 34 L.Ed. 906). COOK et al. v. UNITED STATES. Decided: January 26, 1891. opinion, HARLAN [HTML]. Statement of Case from pages 157-160 intentionally omitted. Jos. Frease, Wm. R. Day, John F. Dillon, Geo. R. Peck, and W. H. Rossington, for plaintiffs in error. Argument of Counsel from pages ...

en.wikisource.org/wiki/Cook_v._United_States

Sep 16, 2015 ... Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Cook v. United States." Sister Projects. sister projects: data item. This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page. Cook v. United States may ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/288/102.html

Case opinion for US Supreme Court COOK v. UNITED STATES. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

en.wikisource.org/wiki/Cook_v._United_States_(288_U.S._102)

Jun 25, 2011 ... [Syllabus from pages 102-104 intentionally omitted]. Messrs. Joseph E. Fitzpatrick, of Providence, R.I., Edmund M. Toland, of Washington, D.C., and Mortimer W. Newton, of Providence, R.I., for petitioner. The Attorney General and Mr. Thomas D. Thacher, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D.C., for the United States.

www.oyez.org/cases/2002/01-1572

Under the False Claims Act (FCA), "any person" who "knowingly presents, or causes to be presented, to an officer or employee of the United States Government...a false or fraudulent claim for payment or approval" is liable to the federal government. A private person may bring a qui tam action "in the name of the ...

casetext.com/case/cook-v-tait

“Or to express it another way, the basis of the power to tax was not and cannot be made dependent upon the situs of the property in all cases, it being in or out of the United States, and was not and cannot be made dependent upon the domicile of the citizen, that being in or out of the United States, but upon his relation as ...