Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Cook

United States v. Cook, 86 U.S. (19 Wall.) 591 (1873), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Indian tribes do not own the land their reservations are on, the land is owned by the United States and the Indians only have a right to occupy the land. They may not cut and sell timber merely for the ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/288/102

U.S. Supreme Court. Cook v. United States, 288 U.S. 102 (1933). Cook v. United States. No. 82. Argued December 7, 1932. Decided January 23, 1933. 288 U.S. 102. Syllabus. 1. The Treaty of May 22, 1924, with Great Britain, as both its language and its history show, was intended to deal completely with the search and ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/288/102/case.html

U.S. Supreme Court. Cook v. United States, 288 U.S. 102 (1933). Cook v. United States. No. 82. Argued December 7, 1932. Decided January 23, 1933. 288 U.S. 102. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS. FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. Syllabus. 1. The Treaty of May 22, 1924, with Great Britain, as both its ...

en.wikisource.org/wiki/Cook_v._United_States

Sep 16, 2015 ... Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Cook v. United States." Sister Projects. sister projects: data item. This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page. Cook v. United States may ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/288/102.html

Case opinion for US Supreme Court COOK v. UNITED STATES. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

legal.un.org/riaa/cases/vol_IV/213-217.pdf

U.S.-Mexico Claims Commission," A.B.A. Jour., Vol. 14, 1928, p. 312 at 313. Nielsen, Commissioner: 1. Claim is made in this case by the United States of America in behalf of George W. Cook to recover the sum of $4,526.58, United States currency, stated to be the equivalent of 9,053.16 Mexican pesos, the aggregate ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/265/47

265 U.S. 47 (44 S.Ct. 444, 68 L.Ed. 895). COOK v. TAIT, Collector of Internal Revenue. No. 220. Argued: April 15, 1924. Decided: May 5, 1924. opinion, McKENNA [HTML]. Messrs. Charles Claflin Allen and Charles Claflin Allen, Jr., both of St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff in error. Argument of Counsel from pages 47-49  ...

openjurist.org/277/f3d/82/united-states-of-america-v-donald-cook

Cook subsequently moved to suppress the cocaine, arguing that the police seized it in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights. The district court denied the motion because it determined that the cocaine was lawfully seized following an investigative stop authorized by Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968). Ultimately, Cook was ...

www.oyez.org/cases/1965/256

Cite this page. APA; Bluebook; Chicago; MLA. "United States v. Cook." Oyez, 17 Apr. 2018, www.oyez.org/cases/1965/256. Legal Information Institute Cornell Law School Justia Illinois Institute of Technology. Facebook Twitter Podcast Subscribe.