Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cook_v_Deeks

Cook v Deeks [1916] UKPC 10 is a Canadian company law case, relevant also for UK company law, concerning the illegitimate diversion of a corporate opportunity. It was decided by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, at that time the court of last resort within the British Empire, on appeal from the Appellate Division ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greasley_v_Cooke

Chadwick (1882) 20 Ch.D. 27 , 44 and Brikom Investments Ltd. v. Carr [1979] Q.B. 467 , 482–483 where I said that when a person makes a representation intending that another should act on it: “It is no answer for the maker to say: 'You would have gone on with the transaction anyway.' That must be mere speculation .

caselaw.findlaw.com/ga-supreme-court/1138533.html

Supreme Court of Georgia. COOKE v. COOKE. No. S04F0347. Decided: March 29, 2004. Bondurant, Mixson & Elmore, Michael B. Terry, Sarah M. Shalf, McGuire, Crohan & Klinger, James D. McGuire, Stanford N. Klinger, for appellant. Stern & Edlin, George S. Stern, David J. Beaudry, for appellee. Appellant Hugh Cooke ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/de-supreme-court/1673789.html

Jul 24, 2014 ... Case opinion for DE Supreme Court COOKE v. STATE. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

caselaw.findlaw.com/fl-district-court-of-appeal/1713394.html

Sep 16, 2015 ... Here, the circuit court found that, “even if [defense counsel] is deemed to be ineffective for failing to advise as to possible deportation consequences,” then the court's warning during the plea colloquy, that the plea “probably” would result in the defendant's deportation, “refute [d] [the defendant's] claim of ...

casebrief.me/casebriefs/cooke-v-oxley

Cooke v Oxley, 1790. Facts: D offered to sell P 266 hogsheads of tobacco. Ds offer to remain open until 4pm. P asked for time to consider the offer, D agreed. P gave notice of acceptance before 4pm. D refused to follow throgh. Issue(s):. Was D legally bound to sell to P? Ratio: There is no 'continuing offer' unless supported  ...

uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/D-101-8612?originationContext=document&transitionType=PLDocumentLink&contextData=(sc.Default)

Nov 24, 2017 ... Cooke v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2017] UKFTT 844 (TC) (24 November 2017). Toggle Table of ContentsTable of Contents. Ctrl + Alt + T to open/close. Links to this case; Content referring to this case. Links to this case. Westlaw UK; Bailii. Content referring to this case. Practical Law is ...

inforrm.org/2014/08/13/case-law-cooke-and-midland-heart-ltd-v-mgn-a-seriously-harmful-approach-to-serious-harm-kirsten-sjovoll

Aug 13, 2014 ... Judgment was handed down today by Mr Justice Bean in the libel case of Cooke and Anor v MGN ([2014] EWHC 2831 (QB)). The judgment follows the trial of two preliminary issues in the case: the meaning of the words complained of; and, most significantly, whether either or both of the publications ...

swarb.co.uk/cooke-and-another-v-mgn-ltd-and-another-qbd-13-aug-2014

Aug 13, 2014 ... References: [2014] EWHC 2831 (QB), [2014] WLR(D) 379, [2014] EMLR 31, [ 2015] 1 WLR 895, [2015] 2 All ER 622. Links: Bailii Coram: Bean J Ratio: The claimants made a television programme about the lives of people on benefits. The defendant published an article critical of many, and included a ...