Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooper_v_Wakley

Cooper v Wakley (1828) 172 ER 507 is an English tort law case, concerning the libel by the editor of The Lancet. Contents. [hide]. 1 Facts; 2 Judgment; 3 See also ; 4 Notes; 5 References; 6 External links. Facts[edit]. Thomas Wakley alleged in The Lancet that Bransby Cooper had negligently performed an operation on a ...

cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/02/22/08-17074.pdf

Feb 22, 2010 ... STANMORE CAWTHON COOPER,. Plaintiff-Appellant,. No. 08-17074 v. D.C. No. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION;. 3:07-cv-01383-.. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION;. VRW. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF. OPINION. TRANSPORTATION,. Defendants-Appellees.. Appeal from the ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/581/15-1262/concur4.html

May 22, 2017 ... I also think that North Carolina cannot satisfy strict scrutiny based on its efforts to comply with §2 of the VRA. See ante, at 12. In my view, §2 does not apply to redistricting and therefore cannot justify a racial gerrymander. See Holder v. Hall, 512 U. S. 874 –923 (1994) (Thomas, J., concurring in judgment).

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-9th-circuit/1538437.html

Feb 22, 2010 ... Case opinion for US 9th Circuit COOPER v. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

harvardlawreview.org/2014/04/dismissing-deterrence

Apr 14, 2014 ... Last June, in Shelby County v. Holder, the Supreme Court scrapped section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act. That provision subjected jurisdictions that met specified criteria to the preclearance requirements of section 5, which, in turn, required those covered to show electoral changes were nondiscriminatory ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/15-1262

May 22, 2017 ... Thornburg v. Gingles, 478 U. S. 30, n. 11 (1986). Section 5, at the time of the districting in dispute, worked through a different mechanism. Before this Court invalidated its coverage formula, see Shelby County v. Holder, 570 U. S. __ ( 2013), that section required certain jurisdictions (including various North ...

theweek.com/articles/659599/first-election-without-full-voting-rights-act--already-disaster

This is the first election without the full Voting Rights Act — and it's already a disaster. Ryan Cooper. REUTERS/Darren Hauck. November 7, 2016. ADVERTISEMENT ... In 2013, when Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts wrote his opinion gutting the Voting Rights Act in Shelby County v. Holder, a key part of his ...

www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2017-05-22/supreme-courts-north-carolina-ruling-could-pave-way-for-more-race-based-gerrymandering-cases

May 22, 2017 ... In a sharply-worded dissent, however, Justices Samuel Alito wrote that politics, not race, was at the center of the case, styled Cooper v. Harris. GOP officials in North Carolina ... 2013 ruling in Shelby County, Alabama, v. Holder, a landmark case that wiped out key provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

www.immigrantdefenseproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Moncrieffe-PA-5-1-13-FINAL.pdf

May 2, 2013 ... MONCRIEFFE V. HOLDER: IMPLICATIONS FOR DRUG CHARGES ... See Moncrieffe v. Holder, No. 11-702, 569 U.S. ___,. 2013 U.S. LEXIS 3313, 2013 WL 1729220 (April 23, 2013). This practice advisory covers: (1) the holding in Moncrieffe; (2) the decision's ...... Cooper, 132 S. Ct. 1376, 1387 (2012).