Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nation_Magazine_v._United_States_Department_of_Defense

In 1990, the United States Department of Defense implemented press pools so they could control and monitor the press during the Gulf War. The competition into the press pools was intense and if a publication wasn't a member of the pool, they were unable to gain access to the warzones and could not fully cover the war.

www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/national-association-of-manufacturers-v-department-of-defense

May 04 2017, Brief amici curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed. May 05 2017, Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for respondents Waterkeeper Alliance, et al. May 10 2017, The time to file respondents' ...

www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/opinions/BLOCK.ENRON020708.pdf

Apr 15, 2008 ... ENRON FEDERAL SOLUTIONS, INC., et al.,. Plaintiffs, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,. Defendant. .... The Department of Defense (“DOD”) issued Defense Reform Initiative Directive No. 9 (“DRID. 3. No. ... contractor purchase and upgrade certain utility systems at Fort Hamilton by the end of the first.

ecf.cofc.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2016cv0784-113-0

Nov 3, 2016 ... Palantir USG, Inc.2 (Palantir) and Palantir Technologies Inc.3 filed a pre-award bid protest in this court on June 30, 2016, challenging the United States Department of the. Army, Army Contracting Command, Aberdeen Proving Group's (the agency) Request for. Proposals No. W56KGY-16-R-0001 (the ...

www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/crt/legacy/2010/12/14/rothe_brief.pdf

Dec 14, 2010 ... v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE &. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE,. Defendants-Appellees. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT .... Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Slater, 228 F.3d 1147 (10th Cir. 2000). . . . . . . . . 35. Alyeska Pipeline Serv. Co. v. Wilderness Soc'y, 421 U.S. 240 (1975).

stanhinton.com/Recent_CAFC_Bid_Protest_Decisions.htm

Guardian Moving Storage Co. v. United States, No. 2015-5132 (Aug. 22, 2016) ( nonprecedential; affirms prior CoFC decision; protest against corrective action was based on flawed assumption that protester's proposal was acceptable and that no corrective action was necessary). Coast Professional, Inc., et al., v. United  ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/467/837

50766. Respondents filed a timely petition for review in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 7607(b)(1). ..... 82-1591, Ruckelshaus, Administrator, Environmental Protection. Agency v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., et al., also on certiorari to the same court.

resources.ca.gov/ceqa/cases/1997/carmel.html

Martin W. Matzen and Joan M. Pepin, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, and Antonio R. Anziano, San Francisco, CA, for defendants- appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Spencer Williams, Senior District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV- 92- 20002 ...

cdn.defensedaily.com/wp-content/uploads/post_attachment/141728.pdf

Aug 24, 2016 ... Anthony F. Schiavetti, United States Department of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, D.C.,. Counsel for ... Airbus Helicopter, Inc.'s UH-72A Lakota helicopter as the "only one responsible source" for future training ..... of RlCHARD A. BREALEY, ET AL., PRINCIPLES OF CORPORATE F INANCE (10th ed.