caselaw.findlaw.com/il-court-of-appeals/1478361.html

Case opinion for IL Court of Appeals DUKES v. Honeywell International, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca6/17-3277/17-3277-2018-06-08.html

Jun 8, 2018 ... Plaintiffs, retirees who worked at Honeywell's Greenville, Ohio plant, were members of a bargaining unit. The final collective bargaining ...

www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/18a0047p-06.pdf

Mar 8, 2018 ... 17-1042. Cooper v. Honeywell Int'l, Inc. Page 3. The focus of the parties' dispute is Article 19.7.4, the provision covering retiree healthcare1:.

www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/18a0108p-06.pdf

Jun 8, 2018 ... Fletcher, et al. v. Honeywell Int'l, Inc. Page 3 dependents1 under Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”), 29 U.S.C..

www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2018/2018-Ohio-474.pdf

Feb 8, 2018 ... Honeywell Internatl., Inc., 153 Ohio St.3d 175, 2018-Ohio-474.] ... the case proceeded to trial against only one—Honeywell International, Inc., ...

www.leagle.com/decision/20051521382fsupp2d113911419

Jul 8, 2005 ... Barbara ALLEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ... of the Garrett Corporation, now part of Honeywell International, Inc. ("Honeywell"). ...... Cunningham v.

www.linkedin.com/in/adriana-cunningham-817a821

Recommendations, 2 people have recommended Adriana Cunningham ... www. careersathoneywell.com #00315742 Director Product Marketing #00315645 ...

www.kirkland.com/sitecontent.cfm?contentID=220&itemID=11039

Honeywell International Inc. (D.D.C.) — Counsel for Honeywell in False Claims Act case ... Luca v. Wyndham (W.D. Pa.) — Counsel for Wyndham in a putative ... In re Anna Cunningham — Counsel for elderly client in DC Court of Appeals who  ...

casetext.com/case/interfaith-community-organization-v-honeywell?resultsNav=false

Oct 19, 2005 ... Org. v. Honeywell Int'l, Inc., 336 F.Supp.2d 370, 404 (D.N.J. 2004) .... current Third Circuit practices," id., citing our decisions in Cunningham v.