Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DIRECTV,_Inc._v._Imburgia

DIRECTV, Inc. v. Imburgia, 577 U.S. ___ (2015), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States clarified when arbitration provisions in contracts are governed by the Federal Arbitration Act. In a 6-3 opinion written by Justice Stephen Breyer, the Court reversed a decision by the California Court of Appeal that ...

www.oyez.org/cases/2015/14-462

Oct 6, 2015 ... On September 7, 2008, Amy Imburgia filed a class action lawsuit against DIRECTV, Inc. (DIRECTV), and argued that DIRECTV had improperly charged early termination fees to its customers. In 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court decided AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, in which the Court held that the ...

blogs.reuters.com/alison-frankel/files/2016/05/DIRECTV-Inc-v-Imburgia.pdf

Supreme Court of the United States. DIRECTV, INC., Petitioner v. Amy IMBURGIA et al. No. 14–462. |. Argued Oct. 6, 2015. |. Decided Dec. 14, 2015. Synopsis. Background: Consumer brought action against satellite television service provider, seeking damages for early termination fees that allegedly violated California law.

www.bakerbotts.com/ideas/publications/2015/12/litigation-update-the-supreme-court-rejects

Dec 21, 2015 ... The state trial court denied DirecTV's motion, and the California Court of Appeal affirmed. Imburgia v. DirecTV, Inc., 225 Cal. App. 4th 338 (2014). The court concluded that the term “law of your state” adopted California law without regard to the operation of FAA pre-emption. The court further found that the ...

www.consumerwatchdog.org/newsrelease/directv-consumer-class-action-against-overcharges-may-go-forward-california-court-appeal

It's the same arbitration agreement that the United States Supreme Court upheld last December as enforceable in DIRECTV, Inc. v. Imburgia. If DIRECTV in fact waived its right to enforce the agreement, as consumer advocates say, DIRECTV customers will be able to go forward with their claims on a class action basis.

law.justia.com/cases/florida/supreme-court/2017/sc15-1249.html

The Communications Services Tax (CST) imposed a 6.8 percent tax rate on cable service and a 10.8 percent tax rate on satellite service. DIRECTV, Inc. and Echostar, LLC filed suit seeking a declaratory judgment holding the sales tax provision in the CST unconstitutional, a permanent injunction against enforcement of the ...

www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/directv-consumer-class-action-against-overcharges-may-go-forward-california-court-of-appeal-says-discredited-arbitration-clause-at-center-of-controversy-says-consumer-watchdog-300265337.html

May 9, 2016 ... It's the same arbitration agreement that the United States Supreme Court upheld last December as enforceable in DIRECTV, Inc. v. Imburgia. If DIRECTV in fact waived its right to enforce the agreement, as consumer advocates say, DIRECTV customers will be able to go forward with their claims on a class ...

www.sccourts.org/opinions/advSheets/no472017.pdf

Dec 13, 2017 ... 5510-State v. Stanley L. Wrapp. Pending. 5513-DIRECTV, Inc. v. S.C. Dep't of Revenue. Pending. 5517-Kiawah Resort v. Kiawah Island. Pending. 5518-State v . Derek V. Collier. Denied 12/07/17. 5519-Robert ... 2017-UP-437-State v. Anthony Janirus Robinson. Pending. 2017-UP-438-Harvey Campbell v.

www.law360.com/articles/647951/la-atty-sanctioned-in-42m-steve-harvey-ip-suit

Apr 27, 2015 ... The defendants are represented by David A. Grossman, Barry I. Slotnick and Thomas D. Nolan III of Loeb and Loeb LLP. The case is We 3 Kings, Inc. v. The Steve Harvey Show et al., case number 2:14-cv-08816, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. --Editing by Rebecca Flanagan.