Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dobson_v._Commissioner

Dobson v. Commissioner, 320 U.S. 489 (1943), was a United States Supreme Court case related to income tax. Contents. [hide]. 1 Background. 1.1 Facts; 1.2 Tax return; 1.3 Tax commissioner; 1.4 Tax court; 1.5 Certiorari. 2 Opinion of the court; 3 References; 4 External links. Background[edit]. Facts[edit]. Four cases were ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/320/489

Dobson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Argued November 8, 1943. Decided December 20, 1943*. 320 U.S. 489. Syllabus. 1. The Tax Court was not required by any statute, applicable regulation, or principle of law to treat as taxable income of the taxpayer a recovery -- in respect of a loss (on a sale of stock) deducted ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/118/10

Dobson v. Dornan. Argued March 31, 1886. Decided April 19, 1886. 118 U.S. 10. Syllabus. The specification of letters patent for a design for a carpet, which is accompanied by a photographic illustration, and merely states that the nature of the design is fully represented in such illustration, and claims "the configuration of the ...

en.wikisource.org/wiki/Dobson_v._Commissioner_of_Internal_Revenue_(320_U.S._489)

Sep 7, 2011 ... United States Supreme Court. 320 U.S. 489. DOBSON v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. Argued: Nov. 8, 1943. --- Decided: Dec 20, 1943. See 321 U.S. 231, 64 S.Ct. 495. Mr. William L. Prosser, of Minneapolis, Minn., for petitioners. Mr. Samuel H. Levy, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.

www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/93-1001.ZO.html

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D.C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/118/10

This is a suit in equity brought in February, 1875, by the appellees, trading as Dornan, Maybin & Co., against the appellants, John Dobson and James Dobson, in the c. ircuit court of the United States for the Eastern district of Pennsylvania, for the infringement of letters patent No. 6,822, for a design for a carpet, granted to ...

www.armfor.uscourts.gov/opinions/2006Term/05-0004.pdf

UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Kimberly E. DOBSON, Sergeant. U.S. Army, Appellant. No. 05-0004. Crim. App. No. 20000098. United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. Argued August 5, 2005. Decided March 20, 2006. EFFRON, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which GIERKE,. C.J., and BAKER and ...

www.justice.gov/atr/case/us-v-att-inc-and-dobson-communications-corp

Jul 9, 2015 ... [Proposed] Final Judgment (October 30, 2007). [Proposed] Preservation of Assets Stipulation and Order (October 30, 2007). Complaint (October 30, 2007). Case Open Date: Tuesday, October 30, 2007. Case Name: United States v. AT&T Inc. and Dobson Communications Corp. Case Type: Civil Merger.

www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf/8/2010/2010-ohio-2339.pdf

May 27, 2010 ... 16} In support of his first argument, defendant cites United States v. Cronic (1984) , 466 U.S. 648, 104 S.Ct. 2039, 80 L.Ed.2d 657, which stands for the proposition that there are rare cases involving Sixth Amendment right to counsel violations, which are presumptively prejudicial. For example, the complete ...