Did you mean: Davis et al v. Them et al ?


Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the ... In October 1997 the District Court granted the writ and ordered him released under supervision. ... for Human Rights, the American Civil Liberties Union, Human Rights Watch, and Carolyn Patty Blum, et al., on behalf of Kim.


DAVIS ET AL. ... If the alien is not removed in those 90 days, the post-removal- period detention statute authorizes ... 00-38, Ashcroft, Attorney General, et al. v.


DAVIS et al. v. SCHNELL et al. ... of depriving plaintiffs and others of the right of franchise on account of race or color; that it has become the general and habitual  ...


ZADVYDAS v. ... DAVIS et al. ... If the alien is not removed in those 90 days, the post-removal-period detention statute authorizes further detention or supervised  ...


Davis, et al. v. Cox, et al. .... despite their argument that disclosure of those documents would infringe upon their First Amendment right to freedom of association.


Davis et al. v. .... It is admitted that the registration books of the Town of Cayce were opened on the 10th day of ... It will be noticed that the case of Gunter v.


Davis, et. al. v. ... owned streetcar lines attempted to segregate the cars, blacks boycotted them for two years. ... The Virginia case was filed as Dorothy E. Davis v .


COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD COUNTY et al. .... It is to be presumed that these [the officials of the schools and the school boards] will obey  ...


DAVIS ET UX. ... DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF KENTUCKY ET AL. v. ... Kentucky exempts from state income taxes interest on bonds issued by it or its ...