Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carpenter_v._United_States

Carpenter v. United States is a pending case before the United States Supreme Court and raises the question of whether the government violates the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution by accessing an individual's historical cell phone locations records without a warrant. The Supreme Court heard oral ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/564/229

While conducting a routine vehicle stop, police arrested petitioner, a passenger of the vehicle, for giving a false name. After handcuffing him and securing the...

www.justice.gov/osg/brief/davis-v-united-states

Jul 3, 2017 ... Davis v. United States. Docket number: 16-1190. Supreme Court Term: 2016 Term. Federal Court: Supreme Court. Court Level: Supreme Court. Filing Date: Monday, July 3, 2017. Type: Petition Stage Response. Brief Topic: Constitutional. Criminal (including Habeas/2255). Briefs: PDF icon ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/445/388.html

Case opinion for US Supreme Court UNITED STATES PAROLE COMM'N v. GERAGHTY. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/constitutional-law/constitutional-law-keyed-to-chemerinsky/the-federal-judicial-power/united-states-parole-commission-v-geraghty

Facts. Plaintiff had twice been denied parole from a federal prison. Plaintiff brought suit challenging the validity of the Parole Commission's Parole Release Guidelines. The district court denied Plaintiff's request to certify the suit as a class action on behalf of “all federal prisoners who are or who will become eligible for ...

www.pdsdc.org/docs/default-source/default-document-library/wills-v-us-parole-commission-et-al---plaintiff-s-motion-for-partial-summary-judgment.pdf?sfvrsn=c54394d0_0

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. ) JOE L. WILLS. ) ) Plaintiff,. ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-1464 (BAH). ) UNITED STATES PAROLE. ) COMMISSION and. ) Oral Hearing Requested. COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER ). SUPERVISION AGENCY FOR THE. ) DISTRICT OF ...

www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/B8DB09ECE25AE95985257E8200526990/$file/13-5177-1562364.pdf

Jul 14, 2015 ... v. ISAAC FULWOOD, JR., CHAIRMAN OF U.S. PAROLE. COMMISSION, ET AL.,. APPELLEES. Appeal from the United States District Court ..... in granting or denying parole.”). In Davis, the Court compared the Board's discretion under the 1987 Regulations to its extensive discretion under the 1980 ...

media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/201010676.enb.pdf

Nov 14, 2014 ... sentenced Addonizio, the Parole Commission instituted a new policy that required him to serve a ... In Davis v. United States, for example, the Supreme Court collaterally reviewed a prisoner's conviction for conduct that was no longer illegal. 417 U.S. 333, 346–47, 94 S. Ct. 2298, 2305. (1974). Because the ...

harvardlawreview.org/2015/06/spencer-v-united-states

Jun 9, 2015 ... Even after Begay, selling crack cocaine is still very much illegal. The majority placed heavy emphasis on United States v. Addonizio, 31× 31. 442 U.S. 178. from 1979. Addonizio's judge gave him ten years in prison, all the while expecting the Parole Commission to release him after three and a half or four.