Web Results

www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/stryker-corp-v-zimmer-inc

Jul 24 2015, Brief of respondents Zimmer, Inc., and Zimmer Surgical, Inc. in opposition filed. Jul 24 2015, Brief amici curiae of Independent Inventor Groups filed. (Distributed). Jul 24 2015, Brief amicus curiae of Nokia Technologies OY, and Nokia USA Inc. filed. Aug 6 2015, Reply of petitioners Stryker Corporation, et al. filed.

patentlyo.com/media/2016/09/13-1668.Opinion.9-7-2016.1.pdf

Sep 12, 2016 ... Before PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and HUGHES, Circuit. Judges. PROST, Chief Judge. This case returns to us on remand from the Supreme. Court of the United States. Halo Elecs., Inc. v. Pulse. Elecs., Inc., 136 S. Ct. 1923 (2016). In the original appeal,. Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer Surgical, Inc., and Zimmer ...

www.ipwatchdog.com/tag/stryker-corporation-v-zimmer-inc

Has the Supreme Court Breathed New Life into Patent Trolls in Halo and Stryker? The chance of a court tripling damages for patent infringement has significantly increased. The Supreme Court, Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc., et al. and Stryker … Chase Means. By Chase Means 1 year ago 12 ...

www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/14-1513_db8e.pdf

Jun 13, 2016 ... Syllabus. HALO ELECTRONICS, INC. v. PULSE ELECTRONICS,. INC., ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR ... Id., at 139. Although there. ——————. *Together with No. 14–1520, Stryker Corp. et al. v. Zimmer, Inc., et al., also on certiorari to the same court.

www.patentdocs.org/2016/06/halo-electronics-inc-v-pulse-electronics-inc-and-stryker-corp-v-zimmer-inc-2016.html

Jun 13, 2016 ... LLC jurisprudence they would have been in the money, because that is just what the Court did today in Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc. and a companion case, Stryker Corp. v. Zimmer, Inc. To recap, the statute (35 U.S.C. § 284) provides that a district court "may increase the damages ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/14-1513

Jun 13, 2016 ... HALO ELECTRONICS, INC., PETITIONER. 14–1513v. PULSE ELECTRONICS, INC., et al. STRYKER CORPORATION, et al., PETITIONERS. 14–1520v. ZIMMER , INC., et al.

law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/new-jersey/njdce/2:2011cv01857/256279/305

HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP. v. ZIMMER, INC. et al, No. 2:2011cv01857 - Document 305 (D.N.J. 2012) case opinion from the District of New Jersey U.S. Federal District Court.

www.paulhastings.com/publications-items/details/?id=5978e969-2334-6428-811c-ff00004cbded

Jun 6, 2016 ... In February, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in two related cases dealing with enhanced damages under 35 U.S.C. § 284: Stryker Corporation, et al. v. Zimmer, Inc., No. 14-1520, and Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc., No. 14-1513. Together, the two cases (consolidated) deal with the ...

www.shb.com/~/media/files/news/2016/law360-sony-computer-entertainment-patent-cases-to-watch-in-2016.pdf?la=en

Dec 24, 2015 ... Noronha of Dentons. Zimmer is represented by Donald Dunner of Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner LLP. The cases are Halo Electronics Inc. v . Pulse Electronics Inc. et al., case number 14-1513, and Stryker. Corp. v. Zimmer Inc., case number 14-1520, in the Supreme Court of the United ...