Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_Defense_v._Duke_Energy_Corp.

Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corporation, 549 U.S. 561 (2007), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that while a term may be used more than once in a statute, an agency has the discretion to interpret each use of the term in a different way based on the context. In a unanimous decision, ...

elawreview.org/case-summaries/environmental-defense-center-inc-v-united-states-environmental-protection-agency-2

... Defense Council (Environmental Petitioners), and petitioners American Forest & Paper Association and the National Association of Home Builders (Industrial Petitioners) brought a facial challenge to the validity of the Phase II Rule of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)[1] on constitutional, statutory, ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/549/561

Apr 2, 2007 ... Despite this definitional identity, the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) regulations interpret “modification” one way for NSPS but differently for PSD. The NSPS regulations require a source to use the best available pollution-limiting technology, see Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense ...

www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/a86b20d79beb893e85258152005ca1b2/$file/17-1145-1682465.pdf

Jul 3, 2017 ... PROTECTION AGENCY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION .... Natural Resources Defense Council, Environmental Integrity. Project .... Accordingly, we have no need to consider the criteria for a stay pending judicial review. Cf. United States. Association of Reptile Keepers, Inc. v. Zinke, 852 F.3d 1131,.

www.oyez.org/cases/2006/05-848

Nov 1, 2006 ... 2) Does the Clean Air Act require the EPA to interpret the term "modification" consistently in its Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) provisions and New Source Performance ... Environmental Defense v. ... Thomas G. Hungar argued the cause for Respondent United States in support of petitioners.

www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/05-848.ZO.html

Apr 2, 2007 ... 1676, broadened federal authority to combat air pollution, see Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U. S. 837, 845–846 (1984) , and directed EPA to devise National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) limiting various pollutants, which the States were obliged to ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/511/328

Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. ... The city petitioned for a writ of certiorari, and we invited the Solicitor General to present the views of the United States. ... 270 (1993); U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, The Nation's Hazardous Waste Management Program at a ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/05-848.ZS.html

Despite this definitional identity, the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) regulations interpret “modification” one way for NSPS but differently for PSD. The NSPS regulations require a source to use the best available pollution-limiting technology, see Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 ...

www.quimbee.com/cases/environmental-defense-v-duke-energy-corp

A summary and case brief of Environmental Defense v. ... United States Supreme Court ... Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations implementing NSPS provided that any physical or operational change to an existing facility that resulted in an increased emissions rate was deemed to be a “modification” and ...