This link should be blue, either as a working redirect or as a link to a disambiguation page. ..... v. Union Pacific Railroad Co. ..... 898, Exxon Mobil Corp . v.


Feb 6, 2018 ... Santa Fe Pac. Pipelines, Inc., 231 Cal. App. 4th 134, 155 (2014), under the doctrine of collateral estoppel. 4 WELLS V. UNION PAC. R.R. CO.


Feb 24, 2017 ... Travis Coleman was a terminal technician formerly employed by ExxonMobil Pipeline Company (EMPCo). Coleman sued EMPCo and his two ...


The predecessor(s) of the defendant, Union Pacific Railroad Company (“Union Pacific”), .... Exxon Mobil Corporation, 998 So.2d at 31; City of New Orleans v.


Shell Oil Company, the Louisiana Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal affirmed the ... a mixed bag for pipeline companies or others whose operations involve canals. .... Union Pacific Railroad Co., 08-2347 (La. App. 1. Cir. 5/13/09), the First Circuit held that ExxonMobil was not entitled to expropriate land owned by Union Pacific  ...


Companies granted power by sovereign. ▫ Serve a public ... Transporting pipeline company's oil only. ❑ Crooks v. Placid Refining Co. ▫ Short segment; part of larger system. ❑ ExxonMobil v. Union Pacific Railroad Co. ▫ Private railroad ...


Exxon Mobil Corporation · insert_drive_fileState v. Bradley ... Fletcher · insert_drive_fileDucote v. Union Pacific Railroad Co. insert_drive_fileDuplantis v.


Regulations33, as required by AB 2729,34 its gas pipeline regulations,35 as .... Union Pacific Resources Co.,51 Anadarko discontinued ..... which has existed in Kansas since approximately 1905, that when a railroad ...... In ExxonMobil v.


Feb 19, 2010 ... 06-0023 MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. v. ... 07-0404 EXXON MOBIL CORP. v. GILL . .... 08-0740 IN RE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO.