Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Ass%27n_v._State_Farm_Mutual_Automobile_Insurance_Co.

Motor Vehicles Manufacturers Association v. State Farm, 463 U.S. 29 (1983), is a United States Supreme Court decision concerning regulations requiring passive restraints in cars. In it, the Court struck down an order by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration rescinding regulations that required either airbags or  ...

law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/michigan/miedce/2:2014cv11700/290988/70

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Pointe Physicial Therapy, LLC et al, No. 2:2014cv11700 - Document 70 (E.D. Mich. 2014) case opinion from the Eastern District of Michigan US Federal District Court.

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/463/29

Motor Veh. Mfrs. Ass'n v. State Farm Ins., 463 U.S. 29 (1983). Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of the United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. No. 82-354 ... In 1987, NHTSA had assumed that airbags would be installed in 60% of all new cars and automatic seatbelts in 40% . But by 1981 it ...

www.law360.com/articles/841193/state-farm-policyholders-win-class-cert-in-1b-rico-suit

Sep 16, 2016 ... An Illinois federal judge Friday certified a class of State Farm policyholders who had filed a Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act suit against the ... State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al., case number 3:12-cv- 0660 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.

caselaw.findlaw.com/ca-court-of-appeal/1129456.html

Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 3, California. Jerry HILL et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent. No. B194463. Decided: September 19, 2008. Hennigan, Bennett & Dorman, J. Michael Hennigan, Robert L. Palmer, Mark Anchor ...

classaction.kccllc.net/SZT

Welcome to the Williams, et al. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. website. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas Case No. 4:11-00749-JMM This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. As a result of a court- ordered mediation in the Williams Action, the parties reached a settlement agreement ...

www.quimbee.com/cases/case-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-co

Facts. Case (plaintiff) was an independent contractor representing three insurance companies (companies) (defendants) as a local agent. Case's written contract with the companies gave the companies the right to cancel the contracts “with or without cause.” The companies terminated Case's representation and Case ...

www.naic.org/documents/legal_amicus_hill_vs_state_farm.pdf

Individually and on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly ... V. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY,. Defendant - Respondent. TAKEN FROM AN ORDER OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT .... of state regulation by enacting the McCarran-Ferguson Act. With regard.

www.insurancejournal.com/magazines/mag-features/2002/09/16/23288.htm

Sep 16, 2002 ... Outrageous! A travesty of Justice! Should be reversed! Both sides have probably said that at one time or another as the case of Campbell vs. State Farm worked it's way through Utah's court system, culminating in the State's Supreme Court upholding an award of $145 million in punitive damages last ...