Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FTC_v._Actavis,_Inc.

FTC v. Actavis, Inc., 570 U.S. ___, 133 S. Ct. 2223 (2013), was a United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court held that the FTC could make an antitrust challenge under the rule of reason against a so-called pay-for-delay agreement, also referred to as a reverse payment patent settlement. Such an agreement is ...

www.ftc.gov/news-events/blogs/competition-matters/2016/01/ftc-v-actavis-causing-pharma-companies-change-their

Jan 13, 2016 ... As antitrust watchers know, the FTC's efforts to combat harmful reverse-payment settlement agreements resulted in the Supreme Court's 2013 landmark decision in FTC v. Actavis, which held that these settlements are subject to antitrust scrutiny. Today, the Bureau of Competition published its latest report, ...

www.wilmerhale.com/pages/publicationsandnewsdetail.aspx?NewsPubId=10737421618

Jun 18, 2013 ... On June 17, 2013, the Supreme Court decided Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis, Inc., No. 12-416, by a 5-3 vote (Justice Alito recused), resolving a circuit split over the appropriate antitrust standard to apply when evaluating "reverse payment" Hatch-Waxman patent litigation settlements between ...