Web Results

masslegalresources.com/the-gillette-company-v-provost-et-al-lawyers-weekly-no-12-040-17

Apr 27, 2017 ... The Gillette Company alleges that four former employees helped ShaveLogic, Inc ., develop a new disposable cartridge shaving razor using Gillette's confidential information. Gillette claims that in so doing Defendants violated G.L. c. 93A, the individual defendants breached non-disclosure agreements with ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/364/479

Shelton v. Tucker (No. 14). Argued: November 7, 1960. Decided: December 12, 1960 [*]. ] Syllabus; Opinion, Stewart; Dissent, Frankfurter; Dissent, Harlan. Syllabus. An Arkansas statute requires every teacher, as a condition ..... Together with No. 83, Carr et al. v. Young et al., on certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arkansas.

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/401/437.html

United States Supreme Court. GILLETTE v. UNITED STATES, (1971). No. 85. Argued: December 9, 1970 Decided: March 8, 1971. [ Footnote * ] Together with No. 325, Negre v. Larsen et al., on certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Petitioner in No. 85, who was convicted for failure to report for ...

www.aclu.org/cases/tucker-et-al-vs-state-idaho-et-al

Jun 16, 2015 ... The complaint alleges that, by failing to provide sufficient oversight, training, and funding to public defenders across the state, Idaho has neglected its responsibility to ensure that people charged with crimes, all of whom are innocent until proven guilty, receive the kind of zealous and thorough ...

www.caaflog.com/category/october-2016-term/united-states-v-tucker

CAAF decided the Army case of United States v. Tucker, 76 M.J. 257, No. 17- 0160/AR (CAAFlog case page) (link to slip op.), on Wednesday, May 23, 2017. With a per curiam opinion issued just thirteen days after oral argument, the court explains that the term neglects in Article 134 does not mean negligence, rejecting the ...

ecf.ksd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Opinions.pl?currentYear

Slaughter v. Johnson County Adult Detention Center, Doc No. 5 (memorandum and order entered) Pages: 2, District Judge Sam A. Crow. 12/12/2017, Civil Case No. 17-2404. John Doe OR v. United States of America et al, Doc No. 12 ( memorandum and order) Pages: 3, District Judge Carlos Murguia. 12/12/2017, Civil ...

www.leagle.com/decision/197917765ohioapp2d1121162

Gillette v. Tucker (1902), 67 Ohio St. 106, 121-22. As part of that duty the. [65 Ohio App. 2d 115]. physician must "reveal to the patient that which in his best interest he should know." Annotation 49 A.L.R. 3d 501, 504 (the annotation discusses generally the liability of a physician for malpractice where he has failed to notify the ...

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2010.03832.x/pdf

Nov 18, 2010 ... AIM To determine dimensionality and item-level properties of the Gillette Functional Assessment. Questionnaire (FAQ) 22-item skill .... Index (CFI), the Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI), root mean square error of approximation ... in the extremes. Factor and Rasch Analysis of the FAQ George E Gorton III et al. 251 ...

www.schlamstone.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Jefferson-Apts.-Inc.pdf

7/26/2016. Jefferson Apts., Inc. v Mauceri (2016 NY Slip Op 26230) ... against. Steven J. Mauceri, et al., Defendants. 7396/2015. For Plaintiff: Novitt ... This judicial exception was first encountered in 1902 in. Gillette v. Tucker, 65 N.E. 865 (Ohio 1902). The Gillette court held that using the surgery date as the starting point for ...