en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northwest_Austin_Municipal_Utility_District_No._1_v._Holder

Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. Holder, 557 U.S. 193 (2009), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court regarding Section 5 of the ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/557/193

Jun 22, 2009 ... NORTHWEST AUSTIN MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NUMBER ONE v. HOLDER, ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al. appeal from the united states ...

www.nytimes.com/interactive/2013/06/25/us/annotated-supreme-court-decision-on-voting-rights-act.html

Jun 25, 2013 ... The decision in Shelby County v. Holder revolves around Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act, which establishes a "coverage formula" to ...

www.brennancenter.org/analysis/effects-shelby-county-v-holder

Aug 6, 2018 ... In the states previously covered by preclearance, Shelby County v. Holder left massive dents in the infrastructure we have to ensure that all ...

www.oyez.org/cases/2008/08-322

Apr 29, 2009 ... Northwest Austin Municipal Util. Dist. No. One v. Holder ... Appellee. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, et al.

www.aclu.org/legal-document/latif-et-al-v-holder-et-al-opinion-and-order

Latif, et al. v. Holder, et al. - District Court Opinion and Order. Facebook · Twitter · Reddit · Email · Print · Download Legal Document ...

www.britannica.com/topic/Northwest-Austin-Municipal-Utility-District-Number-One-v-Holder-et-al

Voting Rights Act: ‚Ķperceived as a test case, Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. Holder, et al. (2009), the Supreme Court declined to rule ...