Web Results

www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/A927D0D5D8A8FB0B85257E5B004F530D/$file/13-5272-1555940.pdf

United States Court of Appeals. FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. Argued February 9, 2015. Decided June 5, 2015. No. 13-5272. LENEUOTI FIAFIA TUAUA, ET AL.,. APPELLANTS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL., . APPELLEES. AMERICAN SAMOA GOVERNMENT AND AUMUA AMATA,.

www.aclu.org/sites/default/files/field_document/sg_brief_in_opposition.pdf

QUARTAVIOUS DAVIS, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI. TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS. FOR THE ELEVENTH .... Stored Communications Act, 18 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.............. 3. 18 U.S.C. .... al to an ongoing criminal investigation.” 18 U.S.C..

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-1st-circuit/1567287.html

May 13, 2011 ... Case opinion for US 1st Circuit UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JUAN MEISES DAVID VAZQUEZ COSS JUAN MIESES JOSE REYES GUERRERO. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/district-of-columbia/dcdce/1:2014cv01523/167956/78

STEELE, ET AL. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 1:2014cv01523 - Document 78 (D.D.C. 2017) case opinion from the District of Columbia US Federal District Court.

www.italaw.com/cases/200

United States of America; Terminal Forest Products Ltd. v. United States of America, UNCITRAL (formerly Canfor Corporation v. United States of America; Tembec et al. v. United States of America; Terminal Forest Products Ltd. v. Case type: International Investment Agreement. Claimant(s):. Canfor Corporation, Terminal ...

www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/evidence/evidence-keyed-to-mueller/privileges/upjohn-co-et-al-v-united-states-et-al

Citation. Upjohn Co. v. United States, 449 U.S. 383, 101 S. Ct. 677, 66 L. Ed. 2d 584, 1981 U.S. LEXIS 56, 49 U.S.L.W. 4093, 81-1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P9138,

www.naea.org/newsroom/news/re-adam-steele-et-al-v-united-states-america-ruling-and-ptin-fees

Jun 6, 2017 ... Re: Adam Steele, et al. v. United States of America Ruling and PTIN Fees. On June 1, 2017, a federal district court ruled that while the IRS may continue to require the use of Preparer Tax Identification Numbers (PTINs), the agency may no longer charge fees to those who obtain and renew them. The ruling ...

www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/101116zor_7khn.pdf

Oct 11, 2016 ... consideration in light of Mathis v. United States, 579 U. S.. ____ (2016). ORDERS IN PENDING CASES. 16M29. DAVENPORT, DAVID V. RODGERS, BRIAN. 16M30. STEWART, ERIC D. V. COLLIER, BRYAN, ET AL. The motions to direct the Clerk to file petitions for writs of certiorari out of time are denied.

dktlibertyproject.org/amicus-briefs

Livestock Marketing Association, et al. (2004). Forfeiture and Seizure Of Property. Dusenberry v. United States (2001) · Star Scientific, Inc. v. Beales (2001) · Board of Education v. Earls, et al. (2002). Free Exercise of Religion and the First Amendment. Guam v. Guerrero (2001). Free Speech and the First Amendment.