Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_Square,_Manhattan

Union Square is an important and historic intersection and surrounding neighborhood in Manhattan, New York City, located where Broadway and the former Bowery Road – now Fourth Avenue – came together in the early 19th century; its name denotes that "here was the union of the two principal thoroughfares of the ...

law.justia.com/cases/new-york/court-of-appeals/2016/97.html

Luz Herrera was injured in an accident while operating a vehicle insured by Hanover Insurance Company, a no-fault insurer. Herrera also had private health ... Interest Research Group v New York State Dept. of Ins., 66 NY2d 444, 448 [ 1985]; see also Financial Services Law § 202 [a]). As the dissent notes, the doctrine of ...

law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/601/210/1734540

The plaintiffs, Sabina and John Gatti, brought suit in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, to recover $42,426.70 under the terms of an insurance policy issued to them by defendant, The Hanover Insurance Company. Defendant had the case removed to this court based on diversity of citizenship. Presently ...

www.quimbee.com/cases/gross-v-hanover-ins-co

Gross (plaintiff) filed an insurance claim with Hanover (defendant) for a large amount of jewelry that was stolen while on consignment at a retail jewelry store called 3-R Jewelers (3-R). Hanover made a motion to implead Anthony Rizzo (3- R's owner) and Joseph Rizzo (a 3-R employee) as third party defendants. Hanover's ...

www.gordonrees.com/publications/2015/a-note-from-the-field-sureties-beware-of-attempts-to-extend-the-miller-act-s-1-year-limitation-period-using-the-reaching-back-doctrine

Introduction. While it is well settled that the one year period for the filing of a Miller Act payment bond lawsuit may be extended in only very limited circumstances, if at all, in a recent case in which we were involved, a subcontractor raised the doctrine of relating back to assert that its late-filed Miller Act suit was valid. This was ...

www.clermontcommonpleas.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/25/2016/10/Ringhand-v-Chaney-MSJs.pdf

vs. : CASE NO. 2011 CVH 01130. CLEMENTINE CHANEY. : Defendant/Third- Party Plaintiff. : Judge McBride vs. : FOREMOST INSURANCE GROUP, et : .... 15 Wing v. Anchor Media Ltd. Of Texas (1991), 59 Ohio St.3d 108, 570 N.E.2d 1095, paragraph three of the syllabus; Welco Indus., Inc. v. Applied Companies (1993)  ...

www.plrbclaimsconference.org/index.cfm?sec=s&cat=C&SC=Adj%20Prop

Harry Parrish, President/CEO, Construction Services Company ... Robert Bragdon, Sr. Training Consultant, Hanover Insurance Group ... Describe advances in mobile technology; Examine the pros and cons of tablets vs. laptops; Review integration with other emerging technologies (aerial mapping, storm tracking); Outline ...

webapps1.cityofchicago.org/activegcWeb

License Type, Company Name, Address, Phone, Lic Expr, Primary Insurance Expr, Secondary Insurance Expr. E - $500,000 ... E - $500,000 PROJECT CEILING, 2 BROTHERS HOME IMPROVEMENTS &, REMODELING 5841 S LASALLE CHICAGO IL 60621, (773)955-8366, 04/27/2018, 03/05/2018. E - $500,000 ...

www.lib.niu.edu/1993/im931115.html

Patrick Media Group, Inc. v. AD-EX, Inc., 240 Ill. App. 3d 487; 608 N .E .2d 427 ( First District, December 30,1992). Plaintiff sought to enjoin defendant from maintaining four advertising signs on the ground that the signs violate provisions of the Chicago Municipal Code. Defendant claims that Section 11-13-1 of the Illinois ...