Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Harris

United States v. Harris, 106 U.S. 629 (1883), sometimes referred to as the Ku Klux Case, was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that it was unconstitutional for the federal government to penalize crimes such as assault and murder. It declared that the local governments have the power to penalize ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/331/145

U.S. Supreme Court. Harris v. United States, 331 U.S. 145 (1947). Harris v. United States. No. 34. Argued December 12, 13, 1946. Decided May 5, 1947. 331 U.S. 145. Syllabus. 1. Upon warrants charging violations of the Mail Fraud Statute and the National Stolen Property Act, five federal agents arrested an accused in the ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/536/545/case.html

HARRIS v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 00-10666. Argued March 25 .... * Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed for the Cato Institute et al. by Stephen P. Halbrook; and for Families Against Mandatory Minimums Foundation by ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/390/234

U.S. Supreme Court. Harris v. United States, 390 U.S. 234 (1968). Harris v. United States. No. 92. Argued January 18, 1968. Decided March 5, 1968. 390 U.S. 234. Syllabus. Pursuant to a departmental regulation, a police officer searched a impounded car held as evidence of a robbery. The search completed, the officer ...

supreme-court-cases.insidegov.com/l/95/Harris-v-United-States

On May 05, 1947, the Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision on Harris v. United States that was conservative in nature.

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/394/286.html

United States Supreme Court. HARRIS v. NELSON, (1969). No. 199. Argued: December 9, 1968 Decided: March 24, 1969. A state prisoner filed a habeas ... Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Michael Meltsner, and Anthony G. Amsterdam filed a brief for the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. , et al. as ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/536/545

Jones v. United States, 526 U. S. 227, 233. And following "shall" are the separate subsections, which explain how defendants are to "be sentenced." Thus this Court can presume that the principal paragraph defines a single crime and its subsections identify sentencing factors. Pp. 552-553. (b) As Jones illustrates, the  ...

www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/harris-v-quinn

Quinn Symposium: Court departs from federalism, First Amendment jurisprudence (Catherine Fisk); Harris v. ... Feb 3 2012, Brief of respondent SEIU Healthcare Illinois and Indiana, et al. in opposition filed. ... Jun 29 2012, The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.

www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-400_f2ah.pdf

May 18, 2015 ... HARRIS v. VIEGELAHN, CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR. THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 14–400. Argued April 1, 2015—Decided May 18, 2015. Individual debtors may seek discharge of their financial obligations under either Chapter 7 or Chapter ...