Web Results

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/09-152.html

BRUESEWITZ ET AL. v. WYETH LLC, FKA WYETH, INC., ET AL., (2011). No. 09- 152. Argued: October 12, 2010 Decided: February 22, 2011. The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (NCVIA or Act) created a no-fault compensation program to stabilize a vaccine market adversely affected by an increase in ...

law.justia.com/cases/california/court-of-appeal/2016/a139238.html

May 25, 2016 ... California's Online Privacy Protection Act of 2003 (OPPA), under the unfair competition law (Bus. & Prof. Code 17200 et. seq.), addresses the obligations of an operator of a commercial Web site or online service regarding the posting of a privacy policy on the Internet. The state sought damages and ...

www.wlf.org/litigating/case_detail.asp?id=630

On February 22, 2011, the U. S. Supreme Court held that a federal law expressly preempts all state-law products liability suits challenging the design of widely administered childhood vaccines, which the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has already determined to be safe and effective. The decision was a victory for the ...

www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/bruesewitz-v-wyeth

Holding: The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which created a no-fault program to provide compensation for vaccine-related injuries, preempts all ... Brief for Respondent Wyeth, Inc. F/K/A Wyeth Laboratories, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Wyeth Lederle, Wyeth Lederle Vaccines and Lederle Laboratories · Reply Brief ...

www.nvic.org/CMSTemplates/NVIC/pdf/NVIC-amicus-as-filed-090809.pdf

Jun 1, 2010 ... v. WYETH, INC., fka WYETH LABORATORIES, et al.,. Respondents. MARY S. HOLLAND. 245 Sullivan Street. New York, NY 10012. (212) 998-6212. BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE ... 22(b)(1) preclude all vaccine design-defect claims even if the .... Harris L. Coulter & Barbara L. Fisher,……8. A Shot in the Dark ...

scocal.stanford.edu/opinion/harris-v-santa-monica-34162

childbirth.‖ (§ 12926, subd. (q)(1).) In FEHA employment discrimination cases that do not involve mixed motives, we have adopted the three-stage burden- shifting test established by McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green (1973) 411 U.S. 792 (McDonnell Douglas). As explained in Guz v. Bechtel National Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th ...

www.oyez.org/court/15151/roberts6

Bruesewitz v. Wyeth Inc. A case in which the Court held that the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act shielded manufacturers from certain product liability ...... Wos v. E.M.A. et al. A case in which the Court held that federal law preempts North Carolina's state law regarding reimbursement of medical expenses from a  ...

www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/S233898.PDF

Dec 21, 2017 ... T.H., a Minor, etc., et al.,. ) ) Plaintiffs and Appellants,. ) ) S233898 v. ) ) Ct.App. 4/ 1 D067839. NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS. ) CORPORATION, ..... The first case to recognize warning label liability was Conte v. Wyeth, Inc. (2008) 168 Cal. App.4th 89 (Conte). In Conte the court concluded that a brand-.

pbmattorneys.com/our-results

“When you go to law school, these are the kinds of cases you read about,” said Attorney Harris L. Pogust “When somebody is presented an opportunity to be ... Elfont, et al. v. Wyeth Pharm. Inc., et al. A Pennsylvania jury ordered Pfizer Inc. to pay $72.6 million in damages to three women who say they developed breast ...