Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riegel_v._Medtronic,_Inc.

Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the pre-emption clause of the Medical Device Amendment bars state common-law claims that challenge the effectiveness or safety of a medical device marketed in a form that received premarket approval from ...

law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/ohio/ohsdce/1:2013cv00301/162815/67

Sep 22, 2016 ... Aaron et al v. Medtronic Inc et al, No. 1:2013cv00301 - Document 67 (S.D. Ohio 2016) case opinion from the Southern District of Ohio U.S. Federal District Court.

caselaw.findlaw.com/mn-court-of-appeals/1698028.html

Apr 20, 2015 ... Case opinion for MN Court of Appeals Claude Davenport, et al., Appellants, v. MEDTRONIC. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw. ... suggests that applicability of the preemption analysis depends on how the device is being promoted to be used” (emphasis added)); Hawkins v. Medtronic, Inc., No.

caselaw.findlaw.com/md-court-of-special-appeals/1680032.html

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. Steven L. McCORMICK, et ux. v. MEDTRONIC, INC., et al. No. 670, Sept. Term, 2013. Decided: October 06, 2014. MEREDITH, BERGER, ARTHUR, JJ. This case principally concerns the extent to which federal law expressly or impliedly preempts state common-law and statutory claims ...

www.leagle.com/decision/infdco20141017c95

Oct 17, 2014 ... DENNIS BRIAN ANDERS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MEDTRONIC, INC., MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC., and DOES 1-100, Defendants. .... Anthony Hawkins, Plaintiff, represented by Eric D. Holland, HOLLAND AND GROVES, L.L.C. & Randall S. Crompton, HOLLAND AND GROVES, L.L.C.. Delores ...

scocal.stanford.edu/opinion/advanced-bionics-corp-v-medtronic-inc-32274

ADVANCED BIONICS CORPORATION et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. MEDTRONIC, INC., Defendant and Appellant. [No. S097308. Dec. 19, 2002.] MEDTRONIC, INC., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; ADVANCED BIONICS CORPORATION et al., Real Parties in ...

www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/ip/boards/bpai/decisions/inform/IRP2014-00487_medtronic_inc_v_nuvasive_inc_paper_8.pdf

______. MEDTRONIC, INC.,. Petitioner, v. NUVASIVE, INC.,. Patent Owner. ______. Case IPR2014-00487. Patent 8,361,156 B2. ______. Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, LORA M. GREEN, and STEPHEN C. SIU, ... Patent Owner, NuVasive, Inc. (“NuVasive”), filed a Patent Owner .... Baccelli et al., US Patent Appl. Pub. No.

fishpostgrant.com/team-member/michael-hawkins

Medtronic, Inc. v. NuVasive, Inc., IPR Case No. IPR 2014-00087. Continental Automotive Systems, Inc. v. Wasica Finance GMBH et. al., IPR Case No. IPR 2014-00295. Continental Automotive Systems, Inc. v. Wasica Finance GMBH et. al., IPR Case No. IPR2014-01454. Schrader Int'l, Inc. et. al. v. Wasica Finance GMBH et.

www.stlcitycircuitcourt.com/Trial%20Dockets/11062017/01_11062017.pdf

6 1422-CC08940-01. ROBERT MORGAN ET AL V JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. DIV3. 7 1522-CC10456. RICHARD HUNT V IMI EQUIP. LLC ET AL .... 67 1622-CC11433. ANTHONY KELLER ET AL V MEDTRONIC, INC. ET AL. 68 1622-CC11436. LC ROBINSON V BRYAN CROWTON ET AL. 69 1622-CC11453.