www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/14-520_d18f.pdf

Mar 22, 2016 ... Cite as: 577 U. S. ____ (2016). Per Curiam. NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the ...

scholarship.law.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2647&context=faculty_publications

narrower” than marital communications privilege); United States v. Burks ... Twenty-two years after Hawkins, however, the Court in Trammel v. ... United States, 358 U.S. 74, 77 (1958) (basic reason for refusing “to pit wife against husband or.

www.c-span.org/video/?454162-1/gamble-v-united-states-oral-argument

Dec 10, 2018 ... The U.S. Supreme Court hears the oral argument in [Gamble v. United States], docket number 17-646.

harvardlawreview.org/2015/06/spencer-v-united-states

Habeas Corpus. Spencer v. United States. Eleventh Circuit Holds Misapplication of "Career Offender" Enhancement Not Cognizable Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

www.courtlistener.com/docket/6614898/hawkins-v-wilkie

Dec 21, 2017 ... SEALED ORDER re 1 SEALED MOTION filed by BRIAN HAWKINS. ... COMPLAINT against DAVID J. SHULKIN, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ...

kb.osu.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/1811/68416/OSLJ_V24N1_0144.pdf

2 Lucas v. Brooks, 85 U.S. (18 Wall.) 436, 452 (1873). 3 United States v. ... Two of the earlier cases involved testimony against the spouse. ..... 73 Hawkins v.

www.nytimes.com/2018/12/06/us/politics/supreme-court-double-jeopardy.html

Dec 6, 2018 ... Saying that the federal government and the states are independent ... Justice Neil M. Gorsuch warned against rushing to overrule decisions ... United States, the 1944 decision that endorsed the detention of Japanese-Americans during World War II ... Kyle D. Hawkins, the solicitor general of Texas, who was ...

scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2848&context=wlulr

See Hawkins v. United States, 358. U.S. 74, 75 (1958) (husband and wife incompetent to testify for or against one another at common law). 12. 445 U.S. at 53; ...

chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5201&context=uclrev

17 See Trammel v United States, 445 US 40, 51-53 (1980) (explaining that the .... for drug-related criminal activity); Hawkins v United States, 358 US 74, 75.