Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brushaber_v._Union_Pacific_Railroad_Co.

Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., 240 U.S. 1 (1916), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the validity of a tax statute called the Revenue Act of 1913, also known as the Tariff Act, Ch. 16, 38 Stat. 166 (October 3, 1913), enacted pursuant to Article I, section 8, clause 1 of, and the ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/91/72

U.S. Supreme Court. United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, 91 U.S. 72 (1875). United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Company. 91 U.S. 72. Syllabus. 1. The solution of the question whether the Union Pacific Railroad Company is required to pay the interest before the maturity of the principal of the bonds issued ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/240/1/case.html

Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Company. No. 140. Argued October 14, 15, 1915. Decided January 24, 1916. 240 U.S. 1. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Syllabus. Under proper averments, a stockholder's suit to restrain a corporation ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/il-supreme-court/1491481.html

Aug 21, 2003 ... Case opinion for IL Supreme Court DAWDY v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

www.illinoiscourts.gov/opinions/AppellateCourt/2012/1stDistrict/1101866.pdf

Feb 21, 2012 ... Appellate Court. Moenning v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., 2012 IL App (1st) 101866. Appellate Court. Caption. RICHARD C. MOENNING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNION PACIFIC. RAILROAD COMPANY, a Utah Corporation, COMMUTER RAIL. DIVISION, the Operation Division of the Regional Transportation.

www.quimbee.com/cases/asarco-llc-v-union-pacific-railroad-co

A summary and case brief of ASARCO, LLC v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., including the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, key terms, and concurrences and dissents.

openjurist.org/615/f2d/1303/romero-v-union-pacific-railroad-h-h-r-b-d-d-a-l

615 F.2d 1303. 22 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 338, 22 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 30,679. Abraisto Vincent ROMERO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD, a corporation, United Transportation Union and Association, H. H. Brandt, R. B.. Murdock, D. D. Sorenson, and A. L.. Young, Defendants-Appellees. No. 78-2006.

archiveswest.orbiscascade.org/ark:/80444/xv98162

Records, primarily of the Law Department of the Union Pacific Railroad Company , located in Portland, Oregon. Includes correspondence ... Electric Power Co. ( Interurban Railway). Monthly Financial Statement. 1945-1946. 2/1, Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. vs. Northern Pacific Terminal Co. of Oregon. Schedules (volume 3).