Web Results

law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/new-york/nywdce/6:2012cv06416/90444/17

Marcotte v. City of Rochester et al, No. 6:2012cv06416 - Document 17 (W.D.N.Y. 2013) case opinion from the Western District of New York US Federal District Court.

caselaw.findlaw.com/az-supreme-court/1386779.html

Case opinion for AZ Supreme Court HILL v. CITY OF PHOENIX. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

www.leagle.com/decision/infdco20150929d05

Sep 28, 2015 ... Cynthia HILL, Gail Williams, Denise Inman, Vickie Gordon, Rolando Lopez, Taura Pate, Ellen Ennis, and Andrea Holly, individually and on behalf of all ..... Kern v. City of Rochester, 93 F.3d 38 , 44 (2d Cir.1996) (internal quotation marks omitted). Liability of a municipal defendant or an individual sued in his ...

www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/15a0291p-06.pdf

Dec 14, 2015 ... ARGUED: Shawn R. Cioffi, SHEEHAN & ASSOCIATES, PLC, Rochester Hills, Michigan, for Appellant ... Michael v. City of Troy Police Dep't, et al. Page 3. The City tabled that investigation shortly thereafter, when Michael notified them (in early. 2009) that he needed brain surgery for a third time. That surgery ...

www.fosters.com/news/20170810/rochesters-case-vs-zoning-board-still-pending

Aug 10, 2017 ... Shortly after the ZBA granted the Toys' variance, the Toys filed their suit against the city, “Donald Toy, et al v. The City of Rochester,” to obtain a court order that stated they didn't need a variance to expand. Howard wrote in his judgment the Toys' suit appeared to be an attempt by the Toys to “hedge their ...

www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/property/property-law-keyed-to-dukeminier/legislative-land-use-controls-the-law-of-zoning/state-v-city-of-rochester

The Defendants, Rochester City Council (Defendants), rezoned a single lot that was low-density, single family zoned to make it high-density residential zoned, in order to permit the building of 49 unit condominium building. Plaintiffs, a neighborhood association and individuals (Plaintiffs), attempted to obtain injunctive relief.

mn.gov/law-library-stat/archive/sct13dkt.html

Jan 20, 2016 ... A13-124, Cedar Bluff Townhome Condominium Association, Inc., Respondent, vs . American Family Mutual .... Below, vs. Troy Schlener, Respondent, Carla Brown, et al., Respondents Below, Minnesota Department of Human Services, Appellant. ... A13-1477, Rochester City Lines, Co., Appellant, vs. City of ...

knightcolumbia.org/sites/default/files/content/Knight_v_Trump_WH_opening_brief.pdf

Oct 13, 2017 ... KNIGHT FIRST AMENDMENT INSTITUTE. AT COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY, et al.,. Plaintiffs, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United. States, et al.,. Defendants. No. 17-cv-5205 (NRB) ..... Comm. to Establish the Gold Standard v. United States, .... Emps. Union v. City of N.Y. Dep't of Parks & Recreation,.

www.certworthy.com/blaisdell.htm

City of Rochester (Civil Action No. 03-138-JD), dated June 30, 2003, dismissing Blaisdell's complaint, is set forth in the Appendix hereto(App. 3-8). The unpublished Order of the United States District Court for District of New Hampshire in George Blaisdell v. City of Rochester, New Hampshire et al. (Civil Action No. 97-82-M) ...