Web Results


The 2016 term of the Supreme Court of the United States began October 3, 2016 and concluded October 1, 2017. The table below illustrates which opinion was filed by each justice in each case and which justices joined each opinion. Contents. [hide]. 1 Table key; 2 2016 term opinions; 3 2016 term membership and ...


Jun 5, 2017 ... Federal forfeiture laws, which are often misused by police, were curtailed today by the U.S. Supreme Court in a unanimous opinion.


June 5, 2017. The Supreme Court of the United States issued decisions in five cases today: Advocate Health ... Honeycutt v. United States, No. 16-142: Petitioner Terry Honeycutt was convicted following a jury trial of conspiring to and knowingly distributing iodine used to make methamphetamine in violation of federal law.


Jan 27, 2017 ... In December 2016, the U.S. Su- preme Court granted certiorari in Honeycutt v. United States to address whether convicted co-conspirators must be held jointly and severally liable for any criminal forfeiture judgment ordered in the case. Federal courts in the past have generally required joint and several ...


Decision: No. The state statute must fit within the “generic” federal definition of the corresponding aggravated felony, and to do that the least of the acts criminalized by the state statute must fall within the generic federal definition. The generic federal definition requires the victim to be below the age of 16, not 18. Honeycutt v.


Oct 26, 2017 ... On June 5th, the United States Supreme Court held in Honeycutt v. United States that a criminal defendant is not jointly and severally liable for property his co- conspirator derived from the crime, and that he only can be ordered to forfeit property he actually obtained from the crime. Although the decision was ...


Court in Honeycutt v. United States, No. 16-142. In. Honeycutt, the question presented, as framed by the government, is “[w]hether 21 U.S.C. 853 renders the members of a drug conspiracy jointly and severally li- able for the forfeiture of the reasonably foreseeable proceeds of the conspiracy.” Government's Merits Brief.


Aug 2, 2017 ... [United States v. Lobo, 2017 WL 2838187 (S.D.N.Y. June 30, 2017).] Defendant, the son of the President of Honduras, was convicted of conspiring with the Cachiros, a Honduran drug trafficking organization, to import hundreds of kilograms of cocaine into the United States. Defendant's role was to provide ...


Jun 30, 2017 ... CalPERS v. ANZ Securities — June 26, 2017. A Significant Victory For Securities Class Action Defendants. The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in California .... status and their compliance with applicable legal requirements, say attorneys with Michael Best &. Friedrich LLP. Honeycutt v. U.S. — June 5, 2017.