Did you mean: Honeycutt v. US ?
Web Results

www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/16pdf/16-142_7l48.pdf

Jun 5, 2017 ... See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. Syllabus. HONEYCUTT v ...

www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/honeycutt-v-united-states

Holding: Because forfeiture pursuant to Section 853(a)(1) of the Comprehensive Forfeiture Act of 1984 is limited to property the defendant himself actually ...

www.scotusblog.com/2017/06/opinion-analysis-no-joint-several-liability-federal-conspiracy-forfeitures

Jun 6, 2017 ... The short opinion in Honeycutt v. United States, written by Justice Sonia Sotomayor (with Justice Neil Gorsuch not participating), did not ...

www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=89bb1443-5e6b-47db-85f8-ea77102620ef

Jun 8, 2017 ... On June 5, 2017, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Honeycutt v. United States, 581 U.S. ___ (2017), a case involving the ...

www.oyez.org/cases/2016/16-142

Mar 29, 2017 ... Terry Honeycutt was a salaried employee who worked at Brainerd Army Store, which was owned by his brother, Tony Honeycutt. In 2008, when ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/16-142

Mar 29, 2017 ... Terry Honeycutt was a salaried employee at his brother's store where he oversaw sales and product inventory. United States v. Honeycutt, No.

assetforfeiturelaw.us/?p=1263

Jun 5, 2017 ... In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court held on June 5, 2017, that the doctrine of Joint and Several Liability does not apply in criminal ...

www.nytimes.com/2017/04/03/business/dealbook/conspiracy-charges-forfeiture-law.html

Apr 3, 2017 ... The Supreme Court wrestled with the breadth of this offense last week, when it heard arguments in Honeycutt v. United States about whether a ...

www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/151892p.pdf

Aug 11, 2017 ... 4. Honeycutt v. United States, reviewing one of the forfeiture statutes at issue here and holding that joint and several liability is unauthorized.