Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newberry_v._United_States

Newberry v. United States, 256 U.S. 232 (1921), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that the United States Constitution did not grant the United States Congress the authority to regulate political party primaries or nomination processes. The court struck down 1911 amendments to the Federal ...

www.businessvalue.com/resources/Valuation-Cases/Howard-vs-US-US-Ct--App-9th-2011.pdf

USTC Cases, Larry E. Howard, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. United. States of America, Defendant-Appellee., U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth. Circuit, 2011-2 U.S.T.C. ¶50,602, (Aug. 29, 2011). Click to open document in a browser. Larry E. Howard, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. United States of America, Defendant- Appellee.

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/356/25

U.S. Supreme Court. HOWARD v. UNITED STATES, 356 U.S. 25 (1958). 356 U.S. 25. HOWARD v. UNITED STATES. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 186, Misc. Decided March 10, 1958. On representations of the ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/269/20/case.html

Agnello v. United States. No. 6. Argued April 23, 1925. Decided October 12, 1925 . 269 U.S. 20. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ... Thomas Agnello, Frank Agnello, Stephen Alba, Antonio Centorino, and Thomas Pace were indicted in the District Court, Eastern District of New York, under § 37, Criminal ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-dc-circuit/1253308.html

United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. Daniel YESUDIAN, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. HOWARD UNIVERSITY, et al., Appellees/Cross-Appellants. Nos. 96-7225, 96-7226. Decided: September 01, 1998. Before: WALD, HENDERSON and GARLAND, Circuit Judges.

www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/03201201bd.pdf

Mar 20, 2012 ... The Court of Federal Claims certified this question to us in accordance with Preseault v. I.C.C., which upheld the constitutionality of the Trails Act but noted that "[s]tate law generally governs the disposition of reversionary interests" and that, "[b]y deeming interim trail use to be like discontinuance rather than ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/344/624

344 U.S. 624 (73 S.Ct. 465, 97 L.Ed. 617). HOWARD et al. v. COMMISSIONERS OF SINKING FUND OF CITY OF LOUISVILLE et al. No. 295. Argued: Jan. 12, 1953. Decided: Feb. 9, 1953. opinion, MINTON [HTML]; dissent, DOUGLAS, BLACK [HTML]. Messrs. W. A. Armstrong and Donald E. Armstrong, Louisville, Ky ., ...

www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/case_reports/rptDisposedCases.pdf

Disposed Cases. The following is a list of cases disposed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit within the last seven days. In addition ... USA v. Jack Ray Austin judge order filed - affirmed. 17-1767. Henry Brown v. City of Detroit, MI, et al. clerk order filed - dismiss case want of prosecution. 17-1787. Darryl Smith v.

www.leagle.com/decision/infdco20100730d68

Jul 30, 2010 ... Plaintiffs are Dr. Larry Howard ("Dr. Howard") and Joan Howard ("Ms. Howard"), collectively ("the Howards"). Defendant is the United States of America. The Howards and the United States each have moved for summary judgment (Ct. Rec . 20; Ct. Rec. 25). Jurisdiction is conferred upon this Court by Title 28 ...