ROKIOT USA, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. Filed: February 8, 2018 as 6:2018cv00062. Defendant: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. Plaintiff: ROKIOT USA, LLC. Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement. Court: Fifth Circuit › Texas › Texas Eastern District Court. Type: Intellectual ...
May 5, 2016 ... The digital touch technology company's new complaints claim Apple Inc.'s iPhone 6 and 6 Plus infringe its patents covering haptic feedback technology, ... Also in the first quarter of this year, Immersion initiated arbitration in the International Chamber of Commerce accusing Samsung Electronics Corp. of ...
PRISUA ENGINEERING CORP. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al. 1: 16-cv-21761; Filed: 05/17/2016; Case Updated Daily; Latest Docket Entry: 02/16/ 2018; PACER. Thank you for your request. You will receive a custom alert email when the Litigation Campaign Assessment is available. ×. Data. Alert. Save.
Tessera Advanced Technologies, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. 2:17 -cv-00671; Filed: 09/28/2017; Case Updated Daily; Latest Docket Entry: 02/15/ 2018; PACER. Thank you for your request. You will receive a custom alert email when the Litigation Campaign Assessment is available. ×. Data. Alert. Save.
Andrea Electronics Corporation v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. 2:16-cv- 05217; Filed: 09/19/2016; Closed: 09/13/2017; Latest Docket Entry: 09/14/2017; PACER. ×. Litigation Campaign Assessments ...
Nov 6, 2017 ... Jun 26 2017, The Acting Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States. Oct 04 2017, Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. Oct 17 2017, Supplemental brief of petitioners Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al. filed. Oct 18 2017, DISTRIBUTED for Conference ...
Mar 9, 2017 ... PRISUA ENGINEERING CORP.,. Plaintiff, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al,. Defendants. /. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 22). Plaintiff responded (ECF No. 28) and Defendants replied (ECF No. 30).