Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitman_v._American_Trucking_Ass%27ns,_Inc.

Whitman v. American Trucking Associations, Inc., 531 U.S. 457 (2001), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court in which the Environmental Protection Agency's National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for regulating ozone and particulate matter was challenged by the American Trucking Association ...

www.darrfirm.com/case-results

Gnojewski v. American Standard Insurance Co. One Million Eight Hundred Thousand Dollar ($1,800,000.00) settlement of a bad faith claim against an insurance ... Rittenhouse v. Scotch Corporation, et al. Settlement recovered for a toddler when her torso and legs were severely burned by a common drain cleaner ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/427/50.html

Case opinion for US Supreme Court YOUNG v. ... (a) Neither of the asserted elements of vagueness has affected these respondents, both of which propose to offer adult fare on a regular basis and allege no ground for claiming or ... John H. Weston argued the cause for respondents American Mini Theatres, Inc., et al.

caselaw.findlaw.com/ca-court-of-appeal/1678685.html

Sep 19, 2014 ... Case opinion for CA Court of Appeal DUCOING MANAGEMENT INC v. Winston ... Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Orange County, Respondent, Winston & AssociatesInsurance Brokers, Inc., et al., Real Parties in Interest. .... A. Standard of Review of Dispositional Language in Appellate Opinions.

www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-txnd-3_12-cv-00496/pdf/USCOURTS-txnd-3_12-cv-00496-0.pdf

Feb 5, 2014 ... Amer. Standard, Inc., Nos. 2:07-cv-10-TJW-CE & 2:08-cv-390-TJW-CE, 2009 WL 4730166, at *3 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 4, 2009); see also Adkins v. Mid-America ... victims of a “single decision, policy or plan” that is improper under federal law. See Clark v. City of Fort Worth, 800 F. Supp. 2d 776, 779-80 (N.D. Tex.

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/495/271

AMERICAN STORES COMPANY et al. .... Thus, as a matter of legal form American and Lucky were merged into a single corporate entity on June 9, 1988, but as a matter of practical fact their business operations have not ... Nevertheless, on the authority of its earlier decision in International Telephone & Telegraph Corp. v.

www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/amicus_briefs/supreme-court-united-states-visa-inc-et-al-petitioners-v-sam-osborn-et-al-visa-inc-et-al-petitioners/p082105_united_states_amicus_brief_in_visa_v_osborn.pdf

Nos. 15-961 and 15-962. In the Supreme Court of the United States. VISA INC., ET AL., PETITIONERS v. SAM OSBORN, ET AL. VISA INC., ET AL., PETITIONERS v. MARY STOUMBOS, ET AL. ON WRITS OF CERTIORARI. TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS. FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT.

www.pacourts.us/assets/opinions/Superior/out/J-A12014-14o%20-%201019838042736650.pdf

Oct 22, 2014 ... v. TRANE US INC., f/k/a AMERICAN. STANDARD, et al; ALLIS-CHALMERS. CORPORATION; AQUA CHEM, INC., d/b/a CLEAVER BROOKS DIVISION,. INDIVIDUALLY AND SUCCESSOR IN. INTEREST TO SPRINGFIELD BOILERS;. AVENTIS CROPSCIENCE USA, INC., a/k/a AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC., ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/297/233/case.html

Grosjean v. American Press Co., Inc., 297 U.S. 233 (1936). Grosjean v. American Press Co., Inc. No. 303. Argued January 14, 1936. Decided February 10, 1936. 297 U.S. 233 ... The tax in question is not an ordinary form of tax, but one single in kind, with a long history of hostile misuse against the freedom of the press.