Web Results

www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/B63C3129A4FE761985257C7C00539949/$file/13-5061-1479431.pdf

United States Court of Appeals. FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. Argued September 24, 2013. Decided February 11, 2014. No. 13-5061. SABINA LOVING, ET AL.,. APPELLEES v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, ET AL.,. APPELLANTS. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/E780A4723CBF0726852580060052C212/$file/15-5013.pdf

United States Court of Appeals. FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. Argued April 14, 2016. Decided August 5, 2016. No. 14-5316. TRUE THE VOTE, INC.,. APPELLANT v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, ET AL.,. APPELLEES. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. (No.

www.journalofaccountancy.com/content/dam/jofa/news/steele-memo.pdf

Jul 24, 2017 ... See Steele v. United States, No. 14-cv-1523, 2017 WL. 2392425 (D.D.C. June 1, 2017). The Court determined that the Service has the authority to require ... regarding testing and eligibility requirements [struck down in Loving v. IRS, 742 F .3d. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 2014)] and the PTIN regulations” are interrelated.

www.oyez.org/cases/2006/06-376

Apr 23, 2007 ... Does Section 6404(h) of the Internal Revenue Code grant the United States Tax Court exclusive jurisdiction to review interest abatement claims made against the Internal Revenue Service?

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-9th-circuit/1057675.html

Case opinion for US 9th Circuit PALMER v. UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.