Web Results

www.quimbee.com/cases/interstate-industries-inc-v-barclay-industries-inc

A summary and case brief of Interstate Industries, Inc. v. Barclay Industries, Inc., including the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, key terms, and concurrences and dissents.

openjurist.org/540/f2d/868/interstate-industries-inc-v-barclay-industries-inc

This diversity action was commenced by Interstate Industries, Inc. (Interstate), plaintiff-appellee, to recover damages from Barclay Industries, Inc. (Barclay), defendant-appellant, for breach of an alleged contract. 3. The pleadings and affidavits reveal that Interstate is an Illinois corporation whose principal place of business is ...

harvardlawreview.org/2016/05/amarin-pharma-inc-v-fda

May 10, 2016 ... See 21 U.S.C. § 331(a) (prohibiting “[t]he introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of any . . . drug . . . that is adulterated or .... Corp. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 557, 566 (1980). The four-part test considers whether the speech, as a threshold matter, “concern[s] lawful activity” and ...

www.chamberlitigation.com/sites/default/files/cases/files/2015/Brief%20for%20Respondents%20%20--%20NY%20v.%20Sprint%20%28NY%20Court%20of%20Appeals%29.pdf

Court of Appeals. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by Eric T. Schneiderman,. Attorney General for the State of New York, and. STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. EMPIRE STATE VENTURES, LLC,. Plaintiffs-Respondents,. - against-. SPRINT NEXTEL CORP., SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P., NEXTEL OF NEW YORK, INC.

nashp.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/MD-atty-general-memo-linked-to-from-the-blog.pdf

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. ASSOCIATION FOR ACCESSIBLE. MEDICINES,. Plaintiff, v. BRIAN E. FROSH et al.,. Defendants. *. *. * Civil Action No. 17-1860-MJG ... B. HB 631 Does Not Discriminate in Any Fashion Against Interstate. Commerce, Nor Does It ... Crawford Prof'l Drugs, Inc. v. CVS Caremark Corp.

www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/152236p.pdf

Sep 28, 2016 ... Every state in the United States has drug substitution laws.11. 8 See 21 U.S.C. § 355(j)(2)(A)(iv). 9 FTC v. Actavis, Inc., 133 S. Ct. 2223, 2228 (2013) (internal quotation marks, brackets, and citation omitted). 10 See 21 U.S.C. § 355(j)(2)(A)( iv); New York ex rel. Schneiderman v. Actavis PLC, 787 F.3d 638, ...

www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/C62A026B396DD4C78525813E004F3BC5/$file/15-1461-1679364.pdf

Jun 13, 2017 ... payphone industry. Before the passage of the 1996 Act, Bell Operating. Companies (“BOCs”) had dominated the payphone industry to the detriment of other .... Council, Inc. v. FCC, 334 F.3d 69, 75 (D.C. Cir. 2003). Under this statutory scheme, the Commission regulates interstate telephone communication.

www.transportation.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/docs/mission/administrations/office-general-counsel/281386/march-2017-litigation-news.pdf

Mar 31, 2017 ... Inc. v. FAA (D.C. Cir. 14-1168). Flytenow is the operator of a website on which pilots could post information about upcoming flights to attract passengers willing to pay a pro rata share of the pilots' operating expenses. After the FAA determined that the pilots who solicit passengers on. Flytenow are engaged ...

ag.ny.gov/press-release/ag-schneiderman-and-us-department-justice-announce-75-million-antitrust-settlement-nyc

Mar 17, 2015 ... NEW YORK –Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman and the U.S. Department of Justice today announced that they have reached a settlement with Coach USA Inc., CitySights LLC, and their joint venture, Twin America, LLC, to remedy the loss in competition in the New York City hop-on, hop-off bus tour ...