en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fictitious_defendants

Commonly this person is identified as "John Doe" or "Jane Doe". As the statute of limitations for many torts such as medical malpractice is generally very short, ...

www.avvo.com/legal-answers/what-does-it-mean-on-a-summons-doe-defendants-1-10-828724.html

Yes, to reiterate, a "DOE" defendant, as in "John Doe" is a defendant that is sued under that name because there may be people who you have ...

epic.org/amicus/daleiden

Jane and John Does 1-10 v. David Daleiden. Whether a Court Properly Enjoined Release of Names and Other Identifying Information Under the Washington ...

pubcit.typepad.com/clpblog/files/VPcomplaint.pdf

Defendants identified at this juncture as John and Jane Doe defendants. ... Upon information and belief, Defendants John Doe Corporations 1 through 10.

www.schlamstone.com/judge-feuerstein-grants-motion-to-dismiss-where-plaintiffs-failed-to-take-timely-steps-to-identify-jane-doe-defendant

Jun 7, 2018 ... [w]here a plaintiff has had ample time to identify a John Doe ... or 'John Does # 1– 10,'” after being given a sufficient opportunity to do so).

answers.justia.com/question/2010/10/24/definition-does-1-100-inclusive-726

Oct 24, 2010 ... A: "Does", "John Doe" or "Jane Doe" are placeholder name used in legal actions for people whose true identity is unknown or must be withheld ...

law.justia.com/cases/new-york/other-courts/2015/2015-ny-slip-op-50045-u.html

Jan 23, 2015 ... [*1] Katzman v John Does No.s 1-10 2015 NY Slip Op 50045(U) Decided on January 23, 2015 Supreme Court, Queens County Elliot, ...

ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5491&context=flr

defendants previously named as John Doe to be outside the scope of the rule, holding that a lack ...... 1:10-CV-93-JVB, 2010 WL 3219135, at *10 (N.D.. Ind. Aug .

ecollections.law.fiu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1071&context=faculty_publications

Nov 11, 2014 ... Howard M. Wasserman, Civil Rights Plaintiffs and John Doe Defendants: A Study in § 1983 Procedure , 25 Cardozo L. Rev. 793 (2003).