Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wyeth_v._Levine

Wyeth v. Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), is a United States Supreme Court case holding that Federal regulatory clearance of a medication does not shield the manufacturer from liability under state law. Contents. [hide]. 1 Facts. 1.1 Vermont jury trial; 1.2 Phenergan's regulatory background; 1.3 Wyeth's motion for judgment as a ...

www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/09-152.pdf

Feb 22, 2011 ... BRUESEWITZ v. WYETH LLC. Syllabus provides that “[n]o vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil ac- tion for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death asso- ciated with the administration of a vaccine after October ..... 42 See , e.g., Johnson v. American Cyanamid Co., 239 Kan. 279, 285,.

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-8th-circuit/1669105.html

Jun 6, 2014 ... Kuhn v. Wyeth, 686 F.3d 618, 624 (8th Cir.2012). Although Minnesota law governs whether Johnson can ultimately prevail on the merits of this products liability action, the sole issue on appeal is the propriety of the district court's exclusion of Johnson's experts' reports. Admissibility of expert testimony is ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/pa-supreme-court/1655620.html

Jan 21, 2014 ... (referencing, inter alia, Brown v. Superior Court, 751 P.2d 470, 482 n. 12 (Cal. 1988)); Lake–Allen v. Johnson & Johnson, L.P., No. 2:08CV00930DAK, slip op., 2009 WL 2252198, at *3 (D.Utah July 27, 2009) (indicating that the Utah Supreme Court's decision in Grundberg—prominently cited by Wyeth in the ...

www.courtswv.gov/supreme-court/docs/fall2010/35296.htm

F. Lane Heard, III Steptoe & Johnson Williams & Connolly Wheeling, West Virginia Washington, DC Counsel for Defendant, Counsel for the Defendant, Danemiller Wyeth & Ketchum W. Henry Jernigan Michael J. Farrell Dinsmore & Shohl Erik W. Legg Charleston, West Virginia Farrell, Farrell & Farrell Counsel for Amicus ...

law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/666/1483/2150760

Alternatively, defendant contends that under Kansas laws as set forth in Johnson v. American Cyanamid, 239 Kan. 279, 718 P.2d 1318 (1986), this court must find as a matter of law that DPT vaccine is an "unavoidably unsafe" prescription drug which contains an adequate warning, and enter judgment in defendant's behalf.

www.cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/opinions-orders/15-1871.Opinion.8-11-2016.1.PDF

Aug 16, 2016 ... JOHN J. MOLENDA, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, New. York, NY, argued for appellant. ... that claims 1–23 of U.S. Patent 7,879,828 (“the '828 patent”) are not unpatentable as obvious. See Apotex Inc. v. Wyeth LLC, No. 2014-00115, 2015 WL 1848261, at *14. (P.T.A.B. Apr. 20, 2015). For the reasons that follow ...

www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Johnson-Johnson-v-Reckis-Petition-and-Appendix.pdf

Oct 8, 2015 ... In Wyeth v. Levine, this Court explained that state tort claims against drug manufacturers for fail- ing to provide additional warnings would be ... son & Johnson. Respondents, the Appellees below, are Lisa Reck- is and Richard Reckis, who sued both individually and as the parents and natural guardians of ...

www.druganddevicelawblog.com/2017/06/fourth-circuit-punts-west-virginia-innovator-liability-issue.html

Jun 19, 2017 ... Well, not too long ago the Fourth Circuit, in McNair v. Johnson & Johnson, ___ F. Appx. ___, 2017 WL 2333843 (4th Cir. May 30, 2017), did what no court of appeals had done since the innovator liability first reared its ugly head in 1994 – it certified the question to the relevant state high court – in this case, ...