Web Results

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-8th-circuit/1048848.html

Dec 4, 2008 ... Case opinion for US 8th Circuit JACKSON v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

www.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinions/Published/112078.p.pdf

Jan 9, 2013 ... summary judgment for her employer, United Parcel Service,. Inc. ("UPS"). For the reasons that follow, we affirm.1. I. A. In reviewing a grant of summary judgment, we recite the facts in the light most favorable to Young as the non-moving party. Dulaney v. Packaging Corp. of America, 673 F.3d 323,. 324-25 ...

www.law360.com/articles/709843/ups-settles-pregnancy-bias-case-that-went-to-high-court

Law360, New York (October 1, 2015, 5:13 PM EDT) -- United Parcel Service Inc. has settled a high-profile pregnancy discrimination case that was revived by the U.S. Supreme Court in March, according to a Thursday filing in Maryland federal court from the package delivery giant and the former UPS driver who brought the  ...

hr.cch.com/ELD/TomickUPS051215.pdf

May 12, 2015 ... MICHAEL TOMICK v. UNITED PARCEL. SERVICE, INC., ET AL. (AC 35896). DiPentima, C. J., and Beach and Prescott, Js. Argued October 20, 2014—officially released May 19, 2015. (Appeal from Superior Court, judicial district of New. London, Cosgrove, J.) Michael C. Harrington, with whom were Stella ...

law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/797/1349/1447471

797 F. Supp. 1349 (1992). Ronald A. WATKINS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. No. J90-0620(W). United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Jackson Division. June 10, 1992. *1350 *1351 Paul Koerber, Abe Rotwein, Jackson, Miss., for plaintiff. Kenneth Milam, Jackson, Miss., ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/575/12-1226

Mar 25, 2015 ... For an employee to succeed on a disparate treatment pregnancy discrimination claim, she must establish a prima facie case of discrimination, and, if her employer's reasons for discriminating against her were facially neutral, that those reasons were pretextual.

www.faegrebd.com/supreme-court-decides-young-v-united-parcel-service-inc

Mar 25, 2015 ... On March 25, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 12-1226, holding that a pregnant worker who seeks to show disparate treatment under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act may do so under the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework if the employer ...

www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/young-v-united-parcel-service

Jun 4 2014, Supplemental brief of respondent United Parcel Service, Inc. filed. ( Distributed). Jun 23 2014, DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 26, 2014. Jun 30 2014, DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 30, 2014. Jul 1 2014, Petition GRANTED. Jul 18 2014, The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the ...

www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-ilnd-1_09-cv-05291/pdf/USCOURTS-ilnd-1_09-cv-05291-5.pdf

Feb 11, 2014 ... v. ) ) Judge Sara L. Ellis. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.,. ) ) Defendant. ) OPINION AND ORDER. Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“ EEOC”) filed a second amended complaint against United Parcel Service, Inc. (“ UPS”) on behalf of former UPS employee Trudi. Momsen and other ...