law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/cafc/11-1105/11-1105-2012-08-13.html

Wake Forest is the owner of asserted patents, and KCI are the exclusive licensees of the patents, which claim methods and apparatuses for treating ...

www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/163785p.pdf

Mar 1, 2018 ... devices subject to federal requirements, Riegel v. Medtronic,. Inc. ... Nephew, Inc. (“Smith & Nephew”), the manufacturer of his hip replacement ...

www.patentdocs.org/2018/02/arthrex-inc-v-smith-nephew-inc-fed-cir-2018.html

Feb 6, 2018 ... 2015)"; "Aqua Products, Inc. v. Matal (Fed. Cir. 2017)" ... in Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., affirming the PTAB's interpretation of the rule.

www.knobbe.com/news/2018/03/hologic-inc-v-smith-nephew-inc

Mar 15, 2018 ... Hologic requested inter partes reexamination of Smith & Nephew's patent that claims a method of removing uterine tissue using an endoscope.

federalcircuitweekly.com/tag/arthrex-inc-v-smith-nephew

Jan 31, 2018 ... Posts about Arthrex Inc v Smith & Nephew written by Albert Bianchi Jr. ... Arthrex Inc v Smith & Nephew, In re Janssen Biotech, Maxlinear Inc. v.

www.wicourts.gov/html/sc/98/98-2162.htm

Jul 12, 2001 ... Green v. Smith & Nephew AHP, Inc., 2000 WI App 192, 238 Wis. 2d 477, 617 N.W.2d 881. ¶3 S&N now argues to this court that the jury verdict ...