Web Results

law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/685/984/1882162

685 F. Supp. 984 (1988). Lucille YOUNG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Samuel R. PIERCE, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. P-80-8-CA. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Paris Division. March 3, 1988. Jonathan Strong, HUD, Washington, D.C., Charlene Berry, HUD, Ft. Worth, Tex., Edward B. Cloutman, III, Mullinax, Wells, Baab ...

www.aclu-wa.org/docs/complaint-bango-v-pierce-county

Complaint - Bango v. Pierce County. Published: Monday, December 4, 2017. PDF icon Download Document (161.84 KB). Court Case: Bango et. al v. Pierce County. Explore More: Jail & Prisons · Mental Health · ACLU Events ...

scocal.stanford.edu/opinion/people-v-pierce-24496

People v. Pierce , 61 Cal.2d 879. [Crim. No. 8152. In Bank. Oct. 29, 1964.] THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ED PIERCE et al., Defendants and Respondents. COUNSEL. Stanley Mosk and Thomas C. Lynch, Attorneys General, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, William B. McKesson, District Attorney, Harry ...

www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publishing/preview/publiced_preview_briefs_pdfs_05_06_04_593_Respondent.authcheckdam.pdf

Sep 22, 2005 ... v. John McDonald. ______. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. ______. BRIEF FOR THE RESPONDENT ...... 12 This Court has already recognized the existence of an implied cause of action to enforce section 1981 against private parties. Jett v. Dallas Indep.

www.jstor.org/stable/3306026

Perls v. Saalfield, supra, though the tendency of all the cases prior to these last two was to treat these contracts as being prima facie in- valid. The question as to .... Coker,6 Ad.& El., 438;. Pilkington v. Scott, 15 M. & W.,. 657; Guerand v. Daudelet, 32 Md.,. 561; Pierce v. Fuller, 8 Mass., 223;. McClung's App., 58 Pa. St., 31;.

www.eckelkampkuenzel.com/ReportedCases.html

Hogan v. NEC, 848 S.W.2d 48 (Mo.App. E.D. 1993). Wilmesherr v. Jett, per curiam (Mo.App. E.D. 1993). Mazzocchio v. Pohlmann & American Family, 861 S.W.2d 208 (Mo.App. E.D. 1993). American Family Standard Insurance Co. v. Hamil, et al, 862 S.W.2d 511 (Mo.App. S.D. 1993). Meyer v. Lipe, 14 S.W.3d 117 ( Mo.

www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Ahmed-Mohamed.pdf

May 18, 2017 ... See Mohamed v. The Blaze, Inc., et al., Cause No. DC 16-12579, in the 162nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas. That case has since been ..... Jett v. Dallas Indep. Sch. Dist., 7 F.3d 1241, 1245 (5th Cir. 1993). Texas Education Code § 11.051(a)(1) provides: “An independent school district is ...

www.law.cornell.edu/nyctap/I96_0217.htm

The State is not a "person" within the statute and it cannot be liable in an action based on Section 1981 (Jett, supra, 491 US at 731; Dennis v County of Fairfax, .... Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith v Curran, 456 US 353, 374-377; Cannon v University of Chicago, 441 US 677, 717; Chotapeg Inc. v Bullawa, 291 NY 70, ...

scholarship.shu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1147&context=circuit_review

The 10th Circuit addressed whether 18 U.S.C. § 875(c), as construed in Virginia v . Black et al., 538 U.S. 343 (2003), “requires the government to prove in any true- threat prosecution that the defendant intended the recipient to feel threatened.” Id . at 975. The 10th Circuit recognized that the 7th and 9th Circuits have embraced  ...