Web Results

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/487/201

487 U.S. 201 (108 S.Ct. 2341, 101 L.Ed.2d 184). John DOE, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES. No. 86-1753. Argued: March 2, 1988. Decided: June 22, 1988. opinion, BLACKMUN [HTML]; dissent, STEVENS [HTML]. Syllabus. Pursuant to a subpoena, petitioner, the target of a federal grand jury investigation, produced some ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/465/605

That Amendment only protects the person asserting the privilege from compelled self-incrimination. Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 396, 96 S.Ct. 1569, 1573 , ... The third subpoena demanded the production of a list of virtually all the business records of one of respondent's companies for the period between January 1, ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/481/102.html

[ Footnote * ] J. Randolph Wilson, William H. Allen, David A. Donohoe, Owen M. Johnson, Jr., and Paul B. Hewitt filed a brief for Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. et al. as amici curiae urging affirmance. JUSTICE STEVENS delivered the opinion of the Court. In United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc., 463 U.S. 418 (1983), we held ...

www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/052553p.pdf

May 24, 2007 ... 2. JANE DOE AND JOHN DOE (1)-(5), all in their official and individual capacities . New Jersey Department of Education;. Jeffrey V. Osowski;. Melinda ..... B. W.B. v . Matula. Matula involved the precise issue before us: can school officials be sued pursuant to § 1983 based on alleged violations of a child's ...

www.wrightslaw.com/law/caselaw/case_Doe_Withers_Complaint.html

Concerned about their son's low grades, the Plaintiffs, John Doe and Jane Doe, scheduled meetings with all of D. D.'s teachers to discuss their son's IEP and to .... Doe v. Withers is a 1992 case decided in part under United States Code Section 1983. (Thus the 15 year confusion.) For some reason, unknown to us, in the past

www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/GDB-Petition-for-Writ-Melba-Acosta-Febo-et-al-v-Franklin-California-Tax-Free-Trust-et-al.pdf

v. FraNkliN caliForNia tax-Free trust,. blueMouNtaiN capital. MaNaGeMeNt, llc, et al.,. Respondents. MartIn J. BIenenstock. Counsel of Record. Mark D. harrIs ...... Accordingly, the Court interprets plaintiffs' contract clause claims as “as-applied” challenges. Cf. John Doe No. 1 v. Reed, 561 U.S.. 186, 194, 130 S. Ct. 2811, 177  ...

www.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/sites/thelegalintelligencer/2017/11/08/public-notices-calendars/?download=wedtli2.pdf

Nov 8, 2017 ... CR2017-189- J. Bologna, AUSA. United States of America v.Edward Millstein, et al. W. Brennan, Esq.; J. Miller, Esq. T. J. SAVAGE, J. Courtroom 9A ..... E.G. SMITH, J. Civil Deputy Clerk, Shana Restucci. (610)333-1836. Criminal Courtroom Deputy. Clerk Jaime Kulick. (610) 333-1837. Holmes Building.

www.saul.com/publications/alerts/younger-abstention-title-ix-litigation-tale-two-outcomes

... in John Doe v. Hazard, et al. that UK's disciplinary process for addressing alleged sexual assault was sufficiently akin to a state criminal proceeding to trigger the abstention doctrine articulated by the Supreme Court in Younger v. Harris, which precludes the involvement of the federal court in ongoing state proceedings.

www.chamberlitigation.com/sites/default/files/cases/files/2015/Brief%20for%20Defendants%20--%20Franklin%20v.%20Puerto%20Rico%20%28First%20Circuit%29.pdf

v. JOHN DOE, in his official capacity as employee or agent of the Government of. Puerto Rico Development Bank for Puerto Rico,. Defendant-Appellant, ...... no revenues at all. In any of the 50 states, an insolvent municipality can file for protection under chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code with its state's consent. During the.