Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fictitious_defendants

A fictitious defendant is a person that cannot be identified by the plaintiff before a lawsuit is commenced. Commonly this person is identified as "John Doe" or " Jane Doe". As the statute of limitations for many torts such as medical malpractice is generally very short, plaintiffs under pressure to issue an originating process ...

pubcit.typepad.com/clpblog/files/VPcomplaint.pdf

JOHN AND JANE DOES 1 THROUGH 100,. JOHN DOE CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH 10, and. OTHER JOHN DOE ENTITIES 1 THROUGH 10, all whose true names are unknown,. Defendants. COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, Video Professor, Inc. ("VPI"), through counsel, for its complaint against. Defendants, states: 1. NATURE ...

answers.justia.com/question/2010/10/24/definition-does-1-100-inclusive-726

Oct 24, 2010 ... A: "Does", "John Doe" or "Jane Doe" are placeholder name used in legal actions for people whose true identity is unknown or must be withheld for legal reasons. " Does 1-100" being used in a particular case probably means that there are up to 100 additional parties (fictitious defendants) to the legal action ...

law.justia.com/cases/new-york/other-courts/2015/2015-ny-slip-op-50045-u.html

Jan 23, 2015 ... [*1] Katzman v John Does No.s 1-10 2015 NY Slip Op 50045(U) Decided on January 23, 2015 Supreme Court, Queens County Elliot, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/aoltimewarner/aolmexi041403cmp.pdf

t.i...A.. ' APR 1 4 2003. A. *T COURT. JOHN DOES 1-10;. NA. Defendants. AMERICA ONLINE'S COMPLAINT. FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE VIRGINIA COMPUTER CRIMES ACT,. THE FEDERAL COMPUTER FRAUD & ABUSE ACT, . AND THE COMMON LAW. Unsolicited bulk e-mail (“UBE") – known popularly as "spam" - has ...

www.nfsesq.com/resources/how-to-add-a-doe-defendant-to-a-complaint

In California, if you are ignorant of the name or identity of a defendant, you may still name that defendant in your complaint by naming him as a “Doe” (as in John Doe). This is allowed by Code of Civil Procedure 474. [CCP 474]. This is why the caption in many legal Complaints filed in California read like this: Henry Hurt,.

www.paed.uscourts.gov/documents/opinions/12D0973P.pdf

Oct 3, 2012 ... John Doe #14. Motion to Vacate Order Granting. Leave to File Subpoena, to Quash. Subpoena, and, Alternatively, for. Protective Order (ECF No. 10). Memorandum of law. As the table indicates, two John Does filed declarations in support of their motions. In. Civil Action No. 12-2088, John Doe #1 filed an ...

www.lawjournalnewsletters.com/sites/lawjournalnewsletters/2018/01/01/sixth-circuit-issues-ruling-of-first-impression-on-unmasking-of-john-doe-defendants-in-copyright-infringement-litigations

Jan 1, 2018 ... Does 1-10, 10-CV05022 (N.D.Calif. 2011), which also involved anonymous blogging. Under this two-part test, as described by the Sixth Circuit in Signature Management: “(1) [t]he plaintiff must produce competent evidence supporting a finding of each fact that is essential to a given cause of action; and (2) if ...

www.cleveland.com/open/index.ssf/2010/06/ohio_supreme_court_clarifies_r.html

Jun 8, 2010 ... Erwin filed her lawsuit on July 10, 2006 -- just days before the statute expired. She named Dr. Joseph E. Bryan and Union Hospital in her complaint as defendants. She figured there were others, though she could not yet be certain. Following Civil Rule 15, she listed other potential defendants as John Doe 1 ...