en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fictitious_defendants

A fictitious defendant is a person that cannot be identified by the plaintiff before a lawsuit is commenced. Commonly this person is identified as "John Doe" or " Jane Doe". ... At the beginning of the lawsuit, it may be impossible to determine which medical professional was negligent, so all persons who treated the plaintiff must ...

www.avvo.com/legal-answers/what-does-it-mean-on-a-summons-doe-defendants-1-10-828724.html

Yes, to reiterate, a "DOE" defendant, as in "John Doe" is a defendant that is sued under that name because there may be people who you have ...

pubcit.typepad.com/clpblog/files/VPcomplaint.pdf

Upon information and belief, Defendants John Doe Corporations 1 through 10 ... 5. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over VPI's claims pursuant to 28 ...

www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John+1%3A1-5&version=NIV

The Word Became Flesh - In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning. Through him.

www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John+1%3A5&version=NIV

The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it.

www.justice.gov/osg/brief/snyder-v-john-does-1-5

Jul 7, 2017 ... John Does, #1-5. Docket number: 16-768. Supreme Court Term: 2016 Term. Federal Court: Supreme Court. Court Level: Supreme Court.

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-8th-circuit/1291733.html

Jul 16, 2009 ... Case opinion for US 8th Circuit SILTA INC v. John Does, Number 1 through 5, Defendants.. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

ballotpedia.org/John_Doe_investigations_related_to_Scott_Walker

The first investigation, which will be referred to as John Doe I, started in May 2010 when .... On November 1, 2010, one day before the election for governor, DA ... The recall election took place on June 5, 2012, with Walker winning by a larger ...

news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/cyberlaw/msdoes12061603cmp.pdf

herein as DOES 1 - 20, inclusive, and therefore sues these defendants by such ..... Defendants' actions violated RCW 5 19.190.020, and entitle Microsoft to.