Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that invalidated prohibitions on desecrating the American flag enforced in 48 of the 50 states. Justice William Brennan wrote for a five-justice majority in holding that the defendant Gregory Lee Johnson's act of flag burning was ...
Johnson v. Superior Court - 50 Cal. 2d 693. ... Aug. 19, 1958.] LOUISE M. JOHNSON et al., Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY ..... "(5) Any affidavit filed pursuant to this section shall be in substantially the following form: (Here set forth court and cause). STATE OF CALIFORNIA). ss. COUNTY OF) ...
Facts and Case Summary - Texas v. Johnson. Facts and case summary for Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989). Flag burning constitutes symbolic speech that is protected by the First Amendment.
During the convention Gregory Lee Johnson and a group of political activists marched through the streets protesting. When the demonstrators reached Dallas City Hall, Johnson poured kerosene on an American flag and burned it. Johnson was arrested and convicted under a Texas state law. In an appeal, Johnson argued ...
Johnson v. Superior Court , 50 Cal.2d 693. [L. A. No. 24942. In Bank. Aug. 19, 1958.] LOUISE M. JOHNSON et al., Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES ..... "(5) Any affidavit filed pursuant to this section shall be in substantially the following form: (Here set forth court and cause). STATE OF CALIFORNIA). ss.
Mar 22, 1977 ... Johnson v. The Queen,  2 S.C.R. 646. Date: 1977-03-22. David Andrew Johnson Appellant;. and. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent. 1977: March 2, 22. Present: Laskin C.J. and Martland, ... 308(b)(ii) of the Criminal Code— Distinctions between ss. 306 and 307. The accused was convicted of ...
Citation. Johnson v. Johnson, 279 P.2d 928, 1954 OK 283, 1954 Okla. LEXIS 748 (Okla. 1954) Brief Fact Summary. Dexter G. Johnson typed a will that he.
Mar 30, 2004 ... ... made by Court of Criminal Appeal in dismissing appeal necessarily leads to conclusion that sentencing judge erred - Whether sentence properly reflects consideration of whether defendant was truly engaged upon one multi-faceted course of criminal conduct. Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) – ss 16A, 16B, 19(2).
In Johnson v. Santa Clara County Transportation Agency/ the United States Supreme Court upheld a voluntary affirmative action plan that authorized consideration of an employee's sex as one factor in making a promotion determination. Although there was no evidence that the defendant, Santa Clara Trans- portation ...