Did you mean: Jones v. US ?
Web Results


United States v. Jones, 132 S.Ct. 945 (2012), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that installing a Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking device on a vehicle and using the device to monitor the vehicle's movements constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment. In 2004 defendant Jones was ...


Citation. 22 Ill.308 F.2d 307, 113 U.S. App. D.C. 352 (D.C. Cir. 1962). Brief Fact Summary. Defendant Jones was found guilty of involuntary manslaughter of his friend's 10-month-old baby where he failed to provide for the child and such failure resulted in the child's death. Synopsis of Rule of Law. Where a penal statute does ...


Nov 8, 2011 ... Antoine Jones was arrested on Oct. 24, 2005, for drug possession after police attached a tracker to Jones's Jeep -- without judicial approval -- and used it to follow him for a month. A jury found Jones not guilty on all charges save for conspiracy, on which point jurors hung. District prosecutors, upset at the ...


A summary and case brief of Jones v. United States, including the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, key terms, and concurrences and dissents.


United States, 362 U.S. 257 (1960). Jones v. United States. No. 69. Argued January 21, 1960. Decided March 28, 1960. 362 U.S. 257. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS. FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. Syllabus. 1. While petitioner was in an apartment which he testified later was ...


Summary of Jones v. United States, United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit (1962). Respondent/Plaintiff: United States. Appellant/ Defendant: Wright Jones; A woman by the name of Shirly Green had a 10 month old son called Anthony Lee Gree. Since Shirly Green was going through financial troubles, ...


Case opinion for US Supreme Court JONES v. UNITED STATES. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.


Jones v. United States 308 F.2d 307 (1962). Jones was caring for Green's baby. Jones failed to take care of the baby and it died. Jones was arrested and charged with involuntary manslaughter. There was some debate as to whether Green was paying Jones to care for the baby. The Trial Court found Jones guilty.


It held the remaining data admissible, because “ '[a] person traveling in an automobile on public thoroughfares has no reasonable expectation of privacy in his movements from one place to another.' ” Ibid. (quoting United States v. Knotts, 460 U. S. 276, 281 (1983) ). Jones's trial in October 2006 produced a hung jury on the ...