Web Results


Oct 28, 2016 ... Case opinion for TX Supreme Court NORTH SHORE ENERGY PETITIONER v. JOHN JAMES HARKINS ET AL RESPONDENTS. Read the Court's full ... North Shore is correct that selection agreements are valid and enforceable under Texas law. See Williams v. Ellison, 493 S.W.2d 734, 738 (Tex. 1973) (“A ...


This later finding is important, as the GLM is held out as a model which would improve treatment outcome over the typical RNR oriented approach (e.g., Laws & Ward, 2011, p. 202). Harkins et al. reported that offenders completing the GLM program were less likely to report feeling they understood their offending and their ...


Apr 30, 2010 ... DEPARTMENT OF LAW,. Plaintiffs-Appellants, and. FREDERICK LINDSTROM by and. No. 08-16075 through his legal guardian, RACHEL. D.C. No. LINDSTROM, and LARRY WANGER,. 2:07-cv-00703-ROS. Plaintiff-Intervenors- Appellants. OPINION v. HARKINS AMUSEMENT ENTERPRISES,. INC.


DEPARTMENT OF LAW,. Plaintiff,. &. FREDERICK LINDSTROM, by and through his legal guardian, RACHEL LINDSTROM, LARRY S. WANGER, and JUSTIN GOPEN,. Plaintiffs-Intervenors, vs. HARKINS ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, INC. , et al.,. Defendants. No. CV07-703 PHX ROS. CONSENT DECREE.


CaseDateState v. Harkins Administrative Services, Inc. et al. (Consent Decree ) November 2011State v. Cinemark Holdings, Inc. et al.


319. REVISITING COLORADO V. CONNELLY: THE. PROBLEM OF FALSE CONFESSIONS IN THE. TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY. Daniel Harkins* ... Leo et al ., Bringing Reliability Back In: False Confessions and Legal Safeguards in the Twenty- ... standing belief in the English common law system that it is better for. 8. Leo et ...


May 12, 2015 ... Introduction. The objective of this study was to develop a process to maximize the safety and effectiveness of disclosing Positron Emission Tomography (PET) amyloid imaging results to cognitively normal older adults participating in Alzheimer's disease secondary prevention studies such as the ...


Jun 23, 2015 ... DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF THE. ) DEAF, et al.,. ) ) Plaintiffs,. ) ) v. ) ) Civil Action No. 3:15-cv-30023-MGM ..... should be stayed under the primary jurisdiction doctrine, pending the promulgation of DOJ regulations regarding captioning at movie theaters. Harkins, No. 07-.


Hendow v. University of. Phoenix or “Who Cares What the DOE Thinks?” ....... 156 . (b) The FCA and the Medicare Program: A Match Not. Made in Heaven . ... Lincoln Law”). 3. 31 U.S.C. § 3730. 4. See generally 1 JACOB A. STEIN ET AL., ADMINISTRATIVE LAW §1.01[4], at 1-25 to -32. (Matthew Bender & Co., Inc., 2007) ...