Did you mean: Laws v. Hawkins et al ?
Web Results


Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, 400 F. Supp. 2d 707 (M.D. Pa. 2005) was the first direct ... Full case name, Tammy Kitzmiller, et al. v. ... The defendants were represented by the Thomas More Law Center (TMLC). ... All eight of the Dover school board members who were up for re-election on November 8, 2005, were ...


ATLANTA HUMANE SOCIETY et al. v. .... and existing case law. Harkins v. Atlanta Humane Society, supra at 360(2), 590 S.E.2d 737; Atlanta Humane Society v.


Apr 30, 2010 ... HARKINS CAMEL VIEW THEATRES,. INC. ... HARKINS CHANDLER FASHION. CENTER ... de Jesus V. Rico, Arizona Center for Disability Law, Tucson, ..... narration; rather, the ADA only requires it to offer all persons.


At issue in this case was the interpretation a land description in an option contract between Landowners and an oil and gas company (Company). Landowners ...


Fred W. Albrecht Grocery Co., 15 F.R.D. 55, 59 (N.D. Ohio 1953); Brush v. Harkins, 9. F.R.D. 681 ... known to party seeking discovery); Arco Pipeline Co. v. S/S Trade ..... work product is entitled to absolute immunity from discovery in all situa- tions;'7 by ... Moulinage et Retorderie de Chavanoz, 509 F.2d 730, 733-34. (4th Cir.


Laws and Ward (2011) state that the Good Lives Model (GLM) they advocate ..... Harkins et al. compared the groups on a psychometric assessment battery .... GLM vs. RNR. When comparing RNR and GLM approaches, it is critical to ...


Bliss v. Marcus's Fieldbrook, Clark County Common Pleas Court Case No. 02-CV -0716 and ... Non-Employees of Chateau Estates Resident Association, et al. v.


The State filed suit against Defendants, affiliated entities doing business under the trade name of “Harkins Theatres” (“Harkins”) and currently operating 25 ...


Jun 23, 2015 ... Justice issues regulations under the ADA on website accessibility. Alternatively ..... Goddard v. Harkins. Amusement Enters., 603 F.3d 666, 675 (9th Cir. ... Decree, Nat'l Fed. of the Blind, et al., United States of America v.