Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aronson_v._Lewis

Aronson v Lewis 473 A 2d 805 (Del 1984) is a US corporate law case, from Delaware concerning the possibility of a shareholder to bring a derivative suit. Contents. [hide]. 1 Facts; 2 Judgment; 3 See also; 4 Notes; 5 References; 6 External links. Facts[edit]. A shareholder claimed that the directors of Meyers Parking System ...

law.justia.com/cases/delaware/supreme-court/1984/473-a-2d-805-4.html

473 A.2d 805 (1984). Senior ARONSON, et al., Defendants Below, Appellants, v. Harry LEWIS, Plaintiff Below, Appellee. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: November 14, 1983. Decided: March 1, 1984. William T. Quillen (argued), Robert K. Payson, Peter M. Sieglaff, Potter, Anderson & Corroon, Wilmington; and Allan ...

www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/corporations/corporations-keyed-to-hamilton/duty-of-care-and-the-business-judgment-rule/aronson-v-lewis

Citation. Aronson v. Lewis, 473 A.2d 805, 1984 Del. LEXIS 305 (Del. Mar. 1, 1984 ) Brief Fact Summary. Plaintiff, Harry Lewis, a stockholder of Meyers.

www.casemine.com/judgement/us/5914c356add7b049347c58cb

JUDGES. Andrew G. T. Moore. ATTORNEY(S). William T. Quillen (argued), Robert K. Payson, Peter M. Sieglaff, Potter, Anderson Corroon, Wilmington; and Allan M. Pepper, Michael D. Braff, Kaye, Scholer, Fierman, Hays Handler, New York City, for appellants. Joseph A. Rosenthal (argued), Morris Rosenthal, P.A., ...

h2o.law.harvard.edu/collages/4289

Dec 12, 2017 ... Senior ARONSON, et al., Defendants Below, Appellants, v. Harry LEWIS, Plaintiff Below, Appellee. 3 ... Thus, the board could not have impartially considered and acted upon the demand. See Lewis v. Aronson, Del.Ch., 466 A.2d 375, 381 ( 1983). 9 ... The plaintiff, Harry Lewis, is a stockholder of Meyers.