en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludwig_v._Massachusetts

Ludwig v. Massachusetts, 427 U.S. 618 (1976), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the ... In determining the scope of that right in state proceedings, the Court stated that the “Fourteenth Amendment .... Washington (1978); Oregon v.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonzales_v._Oregon

Gonzales v. Oregon, 546 U.S. 243 (2006), was a U.S. Supreme Court case which ruled that the United States Attorney General cannot enforce the federal Controlled Substances Act against physicians who prescribed drugs, in compliance with Oregon state law, to terminally ill patients seeking to end ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/427/618

Ludwig v. Massachusetts, 427 U.S. 618 (1976). Ludwig v. Massachusetts. No. ... Moreover, if an accused is indigent, the State is required to furnish him counsel ...

willamette.edu/law/resources/journals/wlo/9thcir/2012/06/ludwig-v-astrue.html

Jun 1, 2012 ... Ludwig v. ... The ALJ informed Ludwig's counsel of the contact, but refused to entirely disregard the communication or ... Salem Oregon 97301.

casetext.com/case/ludwig-v-johnson-1

Therefore it failed to state a cause of action under the "family purpose" ... Beard v. Klusmeier, 158 Ky. 153, 164 S.W. 319, 50 L.R.A. (N.S.) 1100, Ann. Cas. .... to the clause of section 10 of article 1 of the Oregon Constitution quoted above, said:.

www.britannica.com/event/Muller-v-State-of-Oregon

Muller v. State of Oregon, U.S. Supreme Court case decided in 1908 that, although it appeared to promote the health and welfare of female workers, in fact led to ...

www.americanbar.org/groups/public_education/initiatives_awards/students_in_action/muller.html

Muller v. Oregon (208 U.S. 412, 1908) Regulation of the Workplace The Issue Is a state law setting a maximum workday for women constitutional? What's at ...

www.oyez.org/cases/1900-1940/299us353

A case in which the Court ruled that Oregon's criminal syndicalism statute violated the ... De Jonge was arrested and charged with violating the State's criminal ...

www.oyez.org/cases/1900-1940/208us412

The owner of a laundry business, Curt Muller, was fined $10 when he violated the law. Muller appealed the conviction. The state supreme court upheld the law's  ...