Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaye_Scholer

Obtained summary judgment for 15 of the leading brand name prescription drug manufacturers and PhRMA, their trade association, in Clayworth, et al. v. Pfizer Inc, et al., dismissing on the merits an action by California retail pharmacies alleging a conspiracy among brand name prescription drug manufacturers to fix prices ...

healthland.time.com/2011/02/24/bruesewitz-v-wyeth-what-the-supreme-court-decision-means-for-vaccines

Feb 24, 2011 ... Vaccine injury is a tricky thing to prove — medically and legally. So it was inevitably controversial when the Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday against the parents of Hannah Bruesewitz, 18, who suffered seizures and permanent brain damage after receiving a diptheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) vaccine i...

www.americanbar.org/newsletter/publications/aba_health_esource_home/aba_health_law_esource_1104_brown.html

Bruesewitz v. Wyeth's Impact on the Vaccine Safety Debate. By Erin C. Fuse Brown1 & Jalayne J. Arias2, Public Health Law and Policy Program at Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law at Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ. Author Childhood vaccines are extolled for effective prevention of dangerous diseases. However ...

www.wlf.org/litigating/case_detail.asp?id=630

On February 22, 2011, the U. S. Supreme Court held that a federal law expressly preempts all state-law products liability suits challenging the design of widely administered childhood vaccines, which the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has already determined to be safe and effective. The decision was a victory for the ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3460207

Jun 18, 2012 ... The NIH subsequently licensed the candidate vaccine to Wyeth Vaccines for large-scale clinical research and development and interaction with U.S. regulatory ... Intussusception is an uncommon condition in which a portion of the intestine descends, or telescopes, into a distal segment (Hackam et al. 2010) ...

www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/114257p.pdf

Mar 19, 2013 ... Wiest, 2011 WL 2923860, at. *4 (emphasis added) (citing Livingston v. Wyeth, 520 F.3d. 344, 352 (4th Cir. 2008)). Sylvester rejected this requirement ..... Wiest, et al. v. Lynch, et al., No. 11-4257. JORDAN, Circuit Judge, Dissenting. Because I believe the District Court properly determined that the Wiests ...

www.patenting-art.com/decision/decision.htm

Missing Persons et al., October 1984. In one of the very few cases dealing with conceptual art, court rules a work of conceptual art is copyrightable. 471 U.S. 539 Harper & Row Publishers v. Nation Enterprises, May 1985. The First Amendment protects speech of uncopyrightable facts and ideas, but doesn't protect speech of  ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supct/justices/stevens.dec.html

GORECertiorari to the Supreme Court of Alabama. , 517 U.S. 559, 00/00/00; BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, INC. v. GORE , 517 U.S. 559 (1996), 05/20/96; BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM OF THE UNITED STATES, Petitione v. MCORP FINANCIAL, INC., et al. MCORP, et al., Petitioners, v.

www.scs-work.com/areas_of_practice/representative-cases

2017, Farris v. Shenandoah Valley Juvenile Center Commission et al, 5:2017-cv- 00017, United States District Court, Eastern District of Virignia, Civil Rights - Employment ..... 2007, Lynch et al v. Boddie-Noell Enterprises, Inc. 3:2007-cv- 00733, United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, Fair Labor Standards Act.