Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ginzburg_v._United_States

Ginzburg v. United States, 383 U.S. 463 (1966), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court involving the application of the First Amendment to Federal obscenity laws. One of a trio of cases (with Memoirs v. Massachusetts 383 U.S. 413 (1966) and Mishkin v. New York 383 U.S. 502 (1966)) released on the same ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/tx-court-of-appeals/1164823.html

Finally, Medford stepped off the street and began walking through a yard when Officer Price approached him. These articulated facts support Officer Price's decision to question Medford because they reasonably led him to suspect that appellant might be a wanted felon. See United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 n.

caselaw.findlaw.com/tx-court-of-criminal-appeals/1172788.html

See Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). During a subsequent search of appellant's pants pocket, Officer Price discovered a matchbox containing what he believed to be “crack” cocaine. Officer Price informed appellant he was under arrest and asked him to place his hands behind his back. As the ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/tx-court-of-appeals/1407215.html

It is necessary ․ to focus the fact finder's application of the reasonable person standard into the context of an arrest to prevent a conviction based upon some less intrusive type of seizure, e.g., a Terry [v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L .Ed.2d 889 (1968) ] stop. Medford, 13 S.W.3d at 773 (quoting United States v.

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-9th-circuit/1287175.html

United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patrick Flores OAXACA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 99-30062 . Decided: November 15, 2000. Before: FERGUSON, GRABER, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.Vance M. Waliser, Medford, Oregon, for the defendant-appellant.

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/385/26/case.html

Black v. United States. No. 1029, October Term, 1965. Certiorari denied May 2, 1966. Rehearing and certiorari granted,. and case decided November 7, 1966. 385 U.S. 26. ON PETITION FOR REHEARING. Syllabus. After denial of certiorari in this case, the Solicitor General voluntarily advised that, in connection with another ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/359/187/case.html

Held: their federal prosecution was not barred under the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment by their earlier conviction in the State Court. United States v. Lanza, 260 U. S. 377. Pp. 187-196. 247 F.2d 410 affirmed. MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court. During a strike against the Southern ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/430/188/case.html

430 U.S. 188. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS. FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Syllabus. Petitioners were convicted of transporting obscene materials in violation of a federal statute. The conduct that gave rise to the charge occurred before Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15, was decided, announcing ...

www.leagle.com/decision/infdco20160218d74

Feb 17, 2016 ... Medford Police Officer Jennifer Newell investigated Defendant on suspicion that he was manufacturing and delivering psilocybin mushrooms. ... Riley v. California , ___ U.S. ___, 134 S.Ct. 2473 , 2484, 189 L.Ed.2d 430 (2014). Because cell phones have become so common, and so powerful, able to record, ...