Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monroe_v._Pape

Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 (1961), was a United States Supreme Court case that considered the application of federal civil rights law to constitutional violations by city employees. The case was significant because it held that 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a statutory provision from 1871, could be used to sue state officers who ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade

Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court on the issue of abortion. It was decided simultaneously with a companion case, Doe v. Bolton. The Court ruled 7–2 that a right to privacy under the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment extended to a woman's decision to ...

law.justia.com/cases/alabama/supreme-court/2017/1150040.html

Sep 29, 2017 ... After review, the Alabama Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's judgment as to liability and compensatory damages. The Court affirmed the punitive damages awarded to Dry Creek Loggers, Inc., and to Conecuh Timber, Inc. With respect to the punitive-damages awards of the remaining wood dealers, the ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/526/629/case.html

Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc., 523 U. S. 75, 82, including, but not limited to, the harasser's and victim's ages and the number of persons involved. ... *Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed for the American Civil Liberties Union et al . by Sara L. Mandelbaum and Steven R. Shapiro; for the National Education ...

law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/70/1008/2503019

CITY OF ST. LOUIS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY, INC., et al., Defendants. .... Monroe v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc., 654 F. Supp. 661 , 663 (E.D.Mo.1987) (citation omitted). In order to meet this burden, the removing party must show one of the following: (1) there is no possibility that the plaintiff ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/az-court-of-appeals/1657069.html

Feb 10, 2014 ... 1 Jennifer Monroe appeals from the judgment dismissing her negligence action against BASIS School, Inc. This appeal requires us to determine ... that requires a defendant “to conform to a particular standard of conduct in order to protect others against unreasonable risks of harm.” Markowitz v. Ariz.

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/452/549.html

Case opinion for US Supreme Court MONROE v. STANDARD OIL CO.. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw. ... Republic Steel Corp., 447 U.S. 191 , and Alabama Power Co. v. Davis, 431 ..... [ Footnote * ] Martin J. Klaper and David L. Gray filed a brief for Cummins Engine Co., Inc., as amicus curiae urging affirmance.

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/526/629.html

Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc., 523 U. S. 75, 82 , including, but not limited to, the harasser's and victim's ages and the number of persons involved. Courts must also bear in mind that schoolchildren ... AURELIA DAVIS, as next friend of L a SHONDA D., PETITIONER v. MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION et al.

www.lexisnexis.com/legalnewsroom/mealeys/b/newsheadlines/default.aspx?groupkey=litigation&tags=Litigation%20Procedure&pi25564=5

... identical suit filed several years later and settled for tens of million less than the intervenors were looking to recover (Technology Training Associates, Inc., et al. v . ... but he cannot make inferences based on those opinions about the defendants ' guilt, a New Mexico federal judge held Oct. 23 (United States of America v.